» Articles » PMID: 36740608

Deep Learning-based Prediction Model for Postoperative Complications of Cervical Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Ossification

Abstract

Purpose: Postoperative complication prediction helps surgeons to inform and manage patient expectations. Deep learning, a model that finds patterns in large samples of data, outperform traditional statistical methods in making predictions. This study aimed to create a deep learning-based model (DLM) to predict postoperative complications in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

Methods: This prospective multicenter study was conducted by the 28 institutions, and 478 patients were included in the analysis. Deep learning was used to create two predictive models of the overall postoperative complications and neurological complications, one of the major complications. These models were constructed by learning the patient's preoperative background, clinical symptoms, surgical procedures, and imaging findings. These logistic regression models were also created, and these accuracies were compared with those of the DLM.

Results: Overall complications were observed in 127 cases (26.6%). The accuracy of the DLM was 74.6 ± 3.7% for predicting the overall occurrence of complications, which was comparable to that of the logistic regression (74.1%). Neurological complications were observed in 48 cases (10.0%), and the accuracy of the DLM was 91.7 ± 3.5%, which was higher than that of the logistic regression (90.1%).

Conclusion: A new algorithm using deep learning was able to predict complications after cervical OPLL surgery. This model was well calibrated, with prediction accuracy comparable to that of regression models. The accuracy remained high even for predicting only neurological complications, for which the case number is limited compared to conventional statistical methods.

Citing Articles

A deep learning-based prediction model for prognosis of cervical spine injury: a Japanese multicenter survey.

Ito S, Nakashima H, Segi N, Yokogawa N, Sasagawa T, Funayama T Eur Spine J. 2025; .

PMID: 39930051 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08708-0.


Performance and clinical implications of machine learning models for detecting cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review.

Liawrungrueang W, Cho S, Cholamjiak W, Sarasombath P, Twinprai N, Twinprai P Asian Spine J. 2025; 19(1):148-159.

PMID: 39829182 PMC: 11895113. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2024.0452.


Application and Prospects of Deep Learning Technology in Fracture Diagnosis.

Zhang J, Yang J, Wang X, Wang H, Zhou H, Yan Z Curr Med Sci. 2024; 44(6):1132-1140.

PMID: 39551854 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-024-2928-5.

References
1.
Inamasu J, Guiot B, Sachs D . Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: an update on its biology, epidemiology, and natural history. Neurosurgery. 2006; 58(6):1027-39. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000215867.87770.73. View

2.
Mori K, Imai S, Kasahara T, Nishizawa K, Mimura T, Matsusue Y . Prevalence, distribution, and morphology of thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in Japanese: results of CT-based cross-sectional study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(5):394-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000153. View

3.
Fujimori T, Watabe T, Iwamoto Y, Hamada S, Iwasaki M, Oda T . Prevalence, Concomitance, and Distribution of Ossification of the Spinal Ligaments: Results of Whole Spine CT Scans in 1500 Japanese Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(21):1668-1676. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001643. View

4.
Li H, Dai L . A systematic review of complications in cervical spine surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J. 2011; 11(11):1049-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.008. View

5.
Ramos M, Liu G, Tan J, Tan J, Ruiz J, Hey H . Risk factors for surgical complications in the management of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J. 2021; 21(7):1176-1184. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.022. View