Temporal Discounting for Self and Friends in Adolescence: A FMRI Study

Overview

Journal Dev Cogn Neurosci

Publisher Elsevier

Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry

Date 2023 Feb 3

PMID 36736019

Authors

Suzanne van de Groep

Sophie W Sweijen

Erik de Water

Eveline A Crone

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Adolescence is characterized by impulsivity but also by increased importance of friendships. This study took the novel perspective of testing temporal discounting in a fMRI task where choices could affect outcomes for 96 adolescents (aged 10-20-years) themselves and their best friend. Decisions either benefitted themselves (i.e., the Self Immediate - Self Delay' condition) or their friend (i.e., 'Friend Immediate - Friend Delay' condition); or juxtaposed rewards for themselves and their friends (i.e., the 'Self Immediate - Friend Delay' or 'Friend Immediate - Self Delay' conditions). We observed that younger adolescents were more impulsive; and all participants were more impulsive when this was associated with an immediate benefit for friends. Individual differences analyses revealed increased activity in the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex extending in the ventral striatum for immediate relative to delayed reward choices for self. Temporal choices were associated with activity in the prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, insula, and ventral striatum, but only activity in the right inferior parietal lobe was associated with age. Finally, temporal delay choices for friends relative to self were associated with increased activity in the temporo-parietal junction and precuneus. Overall, this study shows a unique role of the social context in adolescents' temporal decision making.

Citing Articles

Growing Up Together in Society (GUTS): A team science effort to predict societal trajectories in adolescence and young adulthood.

Crone E, Bol T, Braams B, de Rooij M, Franke B, Franken I Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 67:101403.

PMID: 38852381 PMC: 11214182. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101403.

Adolescent Neurodevelopment Within the Context of Impulsivity and Substance Use.

Green R, Meredith L, Mewton L, Squeglia L Curr Addict Rep. 2023; 10(2):166-177.

PMID: 38009082 PMC: 10671920. DOI: 10.1007/s40429-023-00485-4.

References

Crone E, Dahl R . Understanding adolescence as a period of social-affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012; 13(9):636-50. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3313. View

van de Groep S, Zanolie K, Burke S, Brandner P, Fuligni A, Crone E . Growing in generosity? The effects of giving magnitude, target, and audience on the neural signature of giving in adolescence. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2022; 54:101084. PMC: 8857499. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101084. View

Yoon J, De La Garza 2nd R, Newton T, Suchting R, Weaver M, Brown G . A COMPARISON OF MAZUR'S AND AREA UNDER THE CURVE FOR DESCRIBING STEEP DISCOUNTERS. Psychol Rec. 2017; 67(3):355-363. PMC: 5621750. DOI: 10.1007/s40732-017-0220-9. View

Lee N, De Groot R, Boschloo A, Dekker S, Krabbendam L, Jolles J . Age and educational track influence adolescent discounting of delayed rewards. Front Psychol. 2014; 4:993. PMC: 3872775. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00993. View

de Water E, Cillessen A, Scheres A . Distinct age-related differences in temporal discounting and risk taking in adolescents and young adults. Child Dev. 2014; 85(5):1881-97. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12245. View

Ersner-Hershfield H, Wimmer G, Knutson B . Saving for the future self: neural measures of future self-continuity predict temporal discounting. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008; 4(1):85-92. PMC: 2656877. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsn042. View

de Water E, Demurie E, Mies G, Scheres A . Temporal discounting in children and adolescents with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a comparison of four scoring methods. Child Neuropsychol. 2023; 30(5):702-721. DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2023.2268768. View

Crone E, Bullens L, van der Plas E, Kijkuit E, Zelazo P . Developmental changes and individual differences in risk and perspective taking in adolescence. Dev Psychopathol. 2008; 20(4):1213-29. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579408000588. View

Lockwood P, Hamonet M, Zhang S, Ratnavel A, Salmony F, Husain M . Prosocial apathy for helping others when effort is required. Nat Hum Behav. 2017; 1(7):0131. PMC: 5555390. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0131. View

10.

Casey B, Getz S, Galvan A . The adolescent brain. Dev Rev. 2008; 28(1):62-77. PMC: 2500212. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.003. View

11.

Carter R, Huettel S . A nexus model of the temporal-parietal junction. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013; 17(7):328-36. PMC: 3750983. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.007. View

12.

Casey B, Somerville L, Gotlib I, Ayduk O, Franklin N, Askren M . Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(36):14998-5003. PMC: 3169162. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1108561108. View

13.

McClure S, Laibson D, Loewenstein G, Cohen J . Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science. 2004; 306(5695):503-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1100907. View

14.

Braams B, Peters S, Peper J, Guroglu B, Crone E . Gambling for self, friends, and antagonists: differential contributions of affective and social brain regions on adolescent reward processing. Neuroimage. 2014; 100:281-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.020. View

15.

Steinberg L, Graham S, OBrien L, Woolard J, Cauffman E, Banich M . Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Dev. 2009; 80(1):28-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01244.x. View

16.

Reynolds B . A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling. Behav Pharmacol. 2006; 17(8):651-67. DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3280115f99. View

17.

Ziegler F, Tunney R . Decisions for others become less impulsive the further away they are on the family tree. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e49479. PMC: 3509068. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049479. View

18.

Achterberg M, Peper J, van Duijvenvoorde A, Mandl R, Crone E . Frontostriatal White Matter Integrity Predicts Development of Delay of Gratification: A Longitudinal Study. J Neurosci. 2016; 36(6):1954-61. PMC: 6602010. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3459-15.2016. View

19.

Blakemore S . The social brain in adolescence. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 9(4):267-77. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2353. View

20.

Olson E, Hooper C, Collins P, Luciana M . Adolescents' performance on delay and probability discounting tasks: contributions of age, intelligence, executive functioning, and self-reported externalizing behavior. Pers Individ Dif. 2008; 43(7):1886-1897. PMC: 2083651. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.016. View