» Articles » PMID: 36712392

Utility of Wearable Physical Activity Monitors in Cardiovascular Disease: a Systematic Review of 11 464 Patients and Recommendations for Optimal Use

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Physical activity (PA) plays an important role in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), functioning as a marker of disease progression and response to therapy. Real-world measurement of habitual PA is now possible through wearable activity monitors, however, their use in cardiovascular patients is not well described.

Methods And Results: We performed a systematic review to summarize how wearable activity monitors have been used to measure PA in patients with CVD, with 11 464 patients included across 108 studies. Activity monitors were primarily used in the setting of cardiac rehabilitation (46, 43%). Most often, triaxial accelerometers (70, 65%) were instructed to be worn at the hip (58, 54%) for 7 days ( = 54, 50%). Thirty-nine different activity monitors were used, with a range of accelerometer specific settings for collection and reporting of activity data. Activity was reported most commonly as time spent in metabolic equivalent-defined activity levels (49, 45%), while non-wear time was defined in just 16 (15%) studies.

Conclusion: The collecting, processing, and reporting of accelerometer-related outcomes were highly heterogeneous. Most validation studies are limited to healthy young adults, while the paucity of methodological information disclosed renders interpretation of results and cross-study comparison challenging. While accelerometers are promising tools to measure real-world PA, we highlight current challenges facing their use in elderly multimorbid cardiology patients. We suggest recommendations to guide investigators using these devices in cardiovascular research. Future work is required to determine optimal methodology and consensus-based development of meaningful outcomes using raw acceleration data.

Citing Articles

Impact of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity on change in renal function in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Sato T, Ono M, Kawamura K, Naganuma W, Shishito N, Morishita S Heart Vessels. 2024; 39(5):393-403.

PMID: 38189923 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-023-02354-6.


Use of Wearable Devices for Peak Oxygen Consumption Measurement in Clinical Cardiology: Case Report and Literature Review.

Bayshtok G, Tiosano S, Furer A Interact J Med Res. 2023; 12:e45504.

PMID: 37581915 PMC: 10466150. DOI: 10.2196/45504.


Wearables for Measuring the Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior of Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis: Systematic Review.

Soulard J, Carlin T, Knitza J, Vuillerme N JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022; 10(8):e34734.

PMID: 35994315 PMC: 9446133. DOI: 10.2196/34734.


Using Consumer-Wearable Activity Trackers for Risk Prediction of Life-Threatening Heart Arrhythmia in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: An Exploratory Observational Study.

Frodi D, Manea V, Diederichsen S, Svendsen J, Wac K, Andersen T J Pers Med. 2022; 12(6).

PMID: 35743727 PMC: 9225164. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12060942.


Wearable Devices for Physical Monitoring of Heart: A Review.

Prieto-Avalos G, Cruz-Ramos N, Alor-Hernandez G, Sanchez-Cervantes J, Rodriguez-Mazahua L, Guarneros-Nolasco L Biosensors (Basel). 2022; 12(5).

PMID: 35624593 PMC: 9138373. DOI: 10.3390/bios12050292.

References
1.
Biswas A, Oh P, Faulkner G, Alter D . A prospective study examining the influence of cardiac rehabilitation on the sedentary time of highly sedentary, physically inactive patients. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017; 61(4):207-214. DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.06.003. View

2.
Anderson L, Thompson D, Oldridge N, Zwisler A, Rees K, Martin N . Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; (1):CD001800. PMC: 6491180. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3. View

3.
Imboden M, Nelson M, Kaminsky L, Montoye A . Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Br J Sports Med. 2017; 52(13):844-850. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096990. View

4.
Thomas R, Beatty A, Beckie T, Brewer L, Brown T, Forman D . Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT FROM THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND PULMONARY REHABILITATION, THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, AND THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019; 39(4):208-225. PMC: 7530797. DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000447. View

5.
Brond J, Arvidsson D . Sampling frequency affects the processing of Actigraph raw acceleration data to activity counts. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015; 120(3):362-9. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00628.2015. View