» Articles » PMID: 31082934

Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT FROM THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND PULMONARY REHABILITATION, THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, AND THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY

Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an evidence-based intervention that uses patient education, health behavior modification, and exercise training to improve secondary prevention outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. CR programs reduce morbidity and mortality rates in adults with ischemic heart disease, heart failure, or cardiac surgery but are significantly underused, with only a minority of eligible patients participating in CR in the United States. New delivery strategies are urgently needed to improve participation. One potential strategy is home-based CR (HBCR). In contrast to center-based CR services, which are provided in a medically supervised facility, HBCR relies on remote coaching with indirect exercise supervision and is provided mostly or entirely outside of the traditional center-based setting. Although HBCR has been successfully deployed in the United Kingdom, Canada, and other countries, most US healthcare organizations have little to no experience with such programs. The purpose of this scientific statement is to identify the core components, efficacy, strengths, limitations, evidence gaps, and research necessary to guide the future delivery of HBCR in the United States. Previous randomized trials have generated low- to moderate-strength evidence that HBCR and center-based CR can achieve similar improvements in 3- to 12-month clinical outcomes. Although HBCR appears to hold promise in expanding the use of CR to eligible patients, additional research and demonstration projects are needed to clarify, strengthen, and extend the HBCR evidence base for key subgroups, including older adults, women, underrepresented minority groups, and other higher-risk and understudied groups. In the interim, we conclude that HBCR may be a reasonable option for selected clinically stable low- to moderate-risk patients who are eligible for CR but cannot attend a traditional center-based CR program.

Citing Articles

Needs and Constraints for Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Within a Community-Based Setting: A Study Based on Focus Group Interviews.

Ma L, Lou S, Zhu X, Zhang R, Wu L, Xu J Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024; 18:1141-1150.

PMID: 38863947 PMC: 11166145. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S462138.


Physical activity, exercise and fitness for prevention and treatment of heart failure.

Lavie C, Ozemek C, Kaminsky L Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 11:100061.

PMID: 38549738 PMC: 10978104. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2021.100061.


Relationship Between Community-Level Distress and Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation, Facility Access, and Clinical Outcomes After Inpatient Coronary Revascularization.

Thompson M, Hou H, Stewart 2nd J, Pagani F, Hawkins R, Keteyian S Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023; 16(11):e010148.

PMID: 37855157 PMC: 10953712. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010148.


Identifying Factors for Low-Risk Participation in Alternative Cardiac Rehabilitation Models for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Using MI'S SCOREPAD.

Brandt E, Garfein J, Pai C, Bryant J, Kline-Rogers E, Fink S Cardiovasc Ther. 2023; 2023:7230325.

PMID: 37719172 PMC: 10504043. DOI: 10.1155/2023/7230325.


Personalized smart voice-based electronic prescription for remote at-home feedback management in cardiovascular disease rehabilitation: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Zhu Y, Xia L, Yan J, Shou X, Zhu L, Sun Y Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1113403.

PMID: 37346107 PMC: 10280988. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1113403.


References
1.
Oerkild B, Frederiksen M, Hansen J, Simonsen L, Skovgaard L, Prescott E . Home-based cardiac rehabilitation is as effective as centre-based cardiac rehabilitation among elderly with coronary heart disease: results from a randomised clinical trial. Age Ageing. 2010; 40(1):78-85. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afq122. View

2.
Higgins R, Murphy B, Goble A, Le Grande M, Elliott P, Worcester M . Cardiac rehabilitation program attendance after coronary artery bypass surgery: overcoming the barriers. Med J Aust. 2008; 188(12):712-4. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01852.x. View

3.
Cowie A, Thow M, Granat M, Mitchell S . A comparison of home and hospital-based exercise training in heart failure: immediate and long-term effects upon physical activity level. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011; 18(2):158-66. DOI: 10.1177/1741826710389389. View

4.
Aamot I, Karlsen T, Dalen H, Stoylen A . Long-term Exercise Adherence After High-intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Randomized Study. Physiother Res Int. 2015; 21(1):54-64. DOI: 10.1002/pri.1619. View

5.
Haskell W . The efficacy and safety of exercise programs in cardiac rehabilitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994; 26(7):815-23. View