» Articles » PMID: 36710782

FMRI Evidence That Hyper-caricatured Faces Activate Object-selective Cortex

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2023 Jan 30
PMID 36710782
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many brain imaging studies have looked at the cortical responses to object categories and faces. A popular way to manipulate face stimuli is by using a "face space," a high dimensional representation of individual face images, with the average face located at the origin. However, how the brain responds to faces that deviate substantially from average has not been much explored. Increasing the distance from the average (leading to increased caricaturing) could increase neural responses in face-selective regions, an idea supported by results from non-human primates. Here, we used a face space based on principal component analysis (PCA) to generate faces ranging from average to heavily caricatured. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we first independently defined face-, object- and scene-selective areas with a localiser scan and then measured responses to parametrically caricatured faces. We also included conditions in which the images of faces were inverted. Interestingly in the right fusiform face area (FFA), we found that the patterns of fMRI response were more consistent as caricaturing increased. However, we found no consistent effect of either caricature level or facial inversion on the average fMRI response in the FFA or face-selective regions more broadly. In contrast, object-selective regions showed an increase in both the consistency of response pattern and the average fMRI response with increasing caricature level. This shows that caricatured faces recruit processing from regions typically defined as object-selective, possibly through enhancing low-level properties that are characteristic of objects.

Citing Articles

The role of expansion and adaptability of face-space for individual differences in face identity processing.

Ficco L, Ramon M, Schroeger A, Kaufmann J, Schweinberger S R Soc Open Sci. 2025; 12(1):240879.

PMID: 39845713 PMC: 11750384. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240879.

References
1.
Ramon M, Caharel S, Rossion B . The speed of recognition of personally familiar faces. Perception. 2011; 40(4):437-49. DOI: 10.1068/p6794. View

2.
Valentine T . A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991; 43(2):161-204. DOI: 10.1080/14640749108400966. View

3.
Bar M, Neta M, Linz H . Very first impressions. Emotion. 2006; 6(2):269-78. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.269. View

4.
Jenkins R, Dowsett A, Burton A . How many faces do people know?. Proc Biol Sci. 2018; 285(1888). PMC: 6191703. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1319. View

5.
Hancock P, Burton A, Bruce V . Face processing: human perception and principal components analysis. Mem Cognit. 1996; 24(1):21-40. View