» Articles » PMID: 36706157

Chromatin Landscape, DSB Levels, and CKU-70/80 Contribute to Patterning of Meiotic DSB Processing Along Chromosomes in C. Elegans

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2023 Jan 27
PMID 36706157
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Programmed DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation is essential for achieving accurate chromosome segregation during meiosis. DSB repair timing and template choice are tightly regulated. However, little is known about how DSB distribution and the choice of repair pathway are regulated along the length of chromosomes, which has direct effects on the recombination landscape and chromosome remodeling at late prophase I. Here, we use the spatiotemporal resolution of meiosis in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline along with genetic approaches to study distribution of DSB processing and its regulation. High-resolution imaging of computationally straightened chromosomes immunostained for the RAD-51 recombinase marking DSB repair sites reveals that the pattern of RAD-51 foci throughout pachytene resembles crossover distribution in wild type. Specifically, RAD-51 foci occur primarily along the gene-poor distal thirds of the chromosomes in both early and late pachytene, and on both the X and the autosomes. However, this biased off-center distribution can be abrogated by the formation of excess DSBs. Reduced condensin function, but not an increase in total physical axial length, results in a homogeneous distribution of RAD-51 foci, whereas regulation of H3K9 methylation is required for the enrichment of RAD-51 at off-center positions. Finally, the DSB recognition heterodimer cKU-70/80, but not the non-homologous end-joining canonical ligase LIG-4, contributes to the enriched off-center distribution of RAD-51 foci. Taken together, our data supports a model by which regulation of the chromatin landscape, DSB levels, and DSB detection by cKU-70/80 collaborate to promote DSB processing by homologous recombination at off-center regions of the chromosomes in C. elegans.

Citing Articles

The chromatin-associated 53BP1 ortholog, HSR-9, regulates recombinational repair and chromosome segregation in the germ line.

Li Q, Hariri S, Calidas A, Kaur A, Huey E, Engebrecht J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38659880 PMC: 11042201. DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.12.589267.


Seeding the meiotic DNA break machinery and initiating recombination on chromosome axes.

Dereli I, Telychko V, Papanikos F, Raveendran K, Xu J, Boekhout M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):2941.

PMID: 38580643 PMC: 10997794. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47020-1.


Genetic and physical interactions reveal overlapping and distinct contributions to meiotic double-strand break formation in .

Raices M, Balmir F, Silva N, Li W, Grundy M, Hoffman D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38463951 PMC: 10925144. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.23.581796.


Metabolic stress-induced long ncRNA transcription governs the formation of meiotic DNA breaks in the fission yeast fbp1 gene.

Tsuruta Y, Senmatsu S, Oe H, Hoffman C, Hirota K PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0294191.

PMID: 38252660 PMC: 10802949. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294191.

References
1.
Van M, Larson B, Engebrecht J . To Break or Not To Break: Sex Chromosome Hemizygosity During Meiosis in Caenorhabditis. Genetics. 2016; 204(3):999-1013. PMC: 5105874. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.194308. View

2.
Saito T, Colaiacovo M . Crossover recombination mediated by HIM-18/SLX4-associated nucleases. Worm. 2014; 3:e28233. PMC: 4091211. DOI: 10.4161/worm.28233. View

3.
Lim J, Stine R, Yanowitz J . Domain-specific regulation of recombination in Caenorhabditis elegans in response to temperature, age and sex. Genetics. 2008; 180(2):715-26. PMC: 2567375. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.090142. View

4.
Kelly W, Schaner C, Dernburg A, Lee M, Kim S, Villeneuve A . X-chromosome silencing in the germline of C. elegans. Development. 2002; 129(2):479-92. PMC: 4066729. DOI: 10.1242/dev.129.2.479. View

5.
Chen S, Tsubouchi T, Rockmill B, Sandler J, Richards D, Vader G . Global analysis of the meiotic crossover landscape. Dev Cell. 2008; 15(3):401-415. PMC: 2628562. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.07.006. View