» Articles » PMID: 36704883

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a Fractional Picosecond 1064 nm Laser for Post-acne Erythema in Adult Chinese Patients

Overview
Date 2023 Jan 27
PMID 36704883
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fractional 1064 nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser (FPNYL) in the treatment of post-acne erythema (PAE) of adult Chinese.

Materials And Methods: A total of 22 patients received 1 session of treatment and were followed up at the eighth week. Primary outcomes were measured by the Clinician erythema assessment scale (CEAS). Secondary outcomes included a global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) and patients' assessment of satisfaction on a five-point scale. Pain scores and adverse effects were also evaluated.

Results: Twenty-two patients with Fitzpatrick skin types III and IV were enrolled in the study and completed all treatments and follow-up visits. The mean CEAS scores fell from 2.74 ± 0.80 to 1.95 ± 0.75 (p < 0.05). The mean GAIS of PAE improvement was 2.46 ± 0.68. Erythema percentile scores by VISIA increased from 32.63 ± 7.0 to 45.75 ± 11.45 (t = 5.442, p = 0). The patient satisfaction score was 1.86 ± 1.17. The pain scores were 3.27 ± 1.17 for the FPNYL treatment (varied from 2 to 6). There were moderate erythema and oedema, which last for 3.84 ± 0.78 days. There were overall 68.18% (15/22) patients who felt pruritus in different degrees and 27.27% patients who encountered acne eruptions (white head type). No scar, hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation was found.

Conclusion: Treatment with fractional 1064 nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser is effective and safe for PAE of Chinese patients.

Citing Articles

Fractional picosecond laser treatment of non-acne atrophic scars and scar erythema in Chinese patients.

Li J, Duan F, Kuang J, Liu X, Pan J, Wei J Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(7):e13856.

PMID: 39031924 PMC: 11259539. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13856.


Picosecond lasers in cosmetic dermatology: where are we now? An overview of types and indications.

Haykal D, Cartier H, Maire C, Mordon S Lasers Med Sci. 2023; 39(1):8.

PMID: 38110831 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03945-5.


Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a fractional picosecond 1064 nm laser for post-acne erythema in adult Chinese patients.

Jia X, Zheng L, Fang L, Zhang L, Wu Y, Yang Y Skin Res Technol. 2023; 29(1):e13274.

PMID: 36704883 PMC: 10155796. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13274.

References
1.
Mahmoud B, Srivastava D, Janiga J, Yang J, Lim H, Ozog D . Safety and efficacy of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet fractionated laser for treatment of acne scars in type IV to VI skin. Dermatol Surg. 2010; 36(5):602-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01513.x. View

2.
Leight-Dunn H, Hadi A, Patel F, Yao C, Tu Y, Chapas A . The effect of a dual-wavelength 532 nm and 1064 nm picosecond-domain laser with a fractionated holographic optic on photoaging and patient age perception: A pilot study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021; 21(1):320-326. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14654. View

3.
Amiri R, Khalili M, Mohammadi S, Iranmanesh B, Aflatoonian M . Treatment protocols and efficacy of light and laser treatments in post-acne erythema. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022; 21(2):648-656. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14729. View

4.
Puaratanaarunkon T, Asawanonda P . Efficacy of a one-session fractional picosecond 1064-nm laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar and enlarged facial pores. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2022; 23(7-8):202-206. DOI: 10.1080/14764172.2022.2055079. View

5.
Park K, Ko E, Seo S, Hong C . Comparison of fractional, nonablative, 1550-nm laser and 595-nm pulsed dye laser for the treatment of facial erythema resulting from acne: a split-face, evaluator-blinded, randomized pilot study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2013; 16(3):120-3. DOI: 10.3109/14764172.2013.854626. View