UK Government's New Placement Legislation is a 'good First Step': a Rapid Qualitative Analysis of Consumer, Business, Enforcement and Health Stakeholder Perspectives

Overview

Journal BMC Med

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Jan 26

PMID 36703194

Authors

Sarah Muir

Preeti Dhuria

Emma Roe

Wendy Lawrence

Janis Baird

Christina Vogel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The current food system in England promotes a population diet that is high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS). To address this, the UK government has implemented legislation to restrict the promotion of HFSS products in prominent locations (e.g. store entrances, checkouts) in qualifying retailers since October 2022. This study investigated the perceived impact of the legislation for affected stakeholders.

Methods: A pre-implementation rapid qualitative evaluation of stakeholder interviews. One hundred eight UK stakeholders participated in the study including 34 consumers, 24 manufacturers and retailers, 22 local authority enforcement officers and 28 academic and charitable health representatives. A participatory conference was used to enable policy recommendations to be confirmed by stakeholders.

Results: Stakeholders perceived the legislation to be a 'good first step' towards improving population diet but recognised this needed to be considered amongst a range of long-term obesity policies. Areas of further support were identified and these are presented as six recommendations for government to support the successful implementation of the legislation: (1) provide a free central HFSS calculator, (2) refine legislation to enhance intent and clarity, (3) conduct a robust evaluation to assess intended and unintended outcomes, (4) provide greater support for smaller businesses, (5) provide ring-fenced resources to local authorities and (6) create and communicate a long-term roadmap for food and health.

Conclusions: This legislation has the potential to reduce impulse HFSS purchases and makes a solid start towards creating healthier retail outlets for consumers. Immediate government actions to create a freely accessible HFSS calculator, support smaller businesses and provide additional resources to local authorities would support successful implementation and enforcement. Independent evaluation of the implementation of the legislation will enable monitoring of potential unintended consequences identified in this study and support refinement of the legislation. A long-term roadmap is necessary to outline strategies to support equal access to healthier and sustainable food across the whole food system within the next 20-30 years.

Citing Articles

Prevalence of High Fat Sugar Salt Products, Labeling Characteristics, and Categories of Foods Sold within In-Store Restricted Areas: A Survey in 3 UK Supermarkets after the 2022 Implementation of the Food (Promotion and Placement) Regulations.

Hurst E, Moore S, Wallis L Curr Dev Nutr. 2024; 9(1):104509.

PMID: 39735732 PMC: 11681850. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104509.

Can nudge interventions targeting healthy food purchases in real-world grocery stores reduce diet-related health disparities? A pooled analysis of four controlled trials.

Stuber J, Beulens J, Ayala G, Crozier S, Dijkstra S, Lin S Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):137.

PMID: 39627771 PMC: 11616344. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01687-3.

Implementation of a UK supermarket intervention to increase purchasing of fresh fruit and vegetables: process evaluation of the WRAPPED natural experiment.

Baird J, Dhuria P, Payne H, Crozier S, Lawrence W, Vogel C Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):128.

PMID: 39529139 PMC: 11552182. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01679-3.

"If government is saying the regulations are important, they should be putting in funding to back it up."- An in-depth analysis of local authority officers' perspectives of the Food (Promotion and Placement) (England) Regulations 2021.

Dhuria P, Muir S, Jenner S, Roe E, Lawrence W, Baird J BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):514.

PMID: 39506702 PMC: 11539601. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03720-5.

Choice architecture promotes sustainable choices in online food-delivery apps.

Lohmann P, Gsottbauer E, Farrington J, Human S, Reisch L PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(10):pgae422.

PMID: 39372540 PMC: 11450623. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae422.

References

Taylor B, Henshall C, Kenyon S, Litchfield I, Greenfield S . Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(10):e019993. PMC: 6194404. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019993. View

Ponce J, Yuan H, Schillinger D, Mahmood H, Lee M, Falbe J . Retailer perspectives on sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in the California Bay Area. Prev Med Rep. 2020; 19:101129. PMC: 7322349. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101129. View

Piernas C, Harmer G, Jebb S . Removing seasonal confectionery from prominent store locations and purchasing behaviour within a major UK supermarket: Evaluation of a nonrandomised controlled intervention study. PLoS Med. 2022; 19(3):e1003951. PMC: 8946674. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003951. View

DeJonckheere M, Vaughn L . Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Fam Med Community Health. 2020; 7(2):e000057. PMC: 6910737. DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000057. View

Goffe L, Penn L, Adams J, Araujo-Soares V, Summerbell C, Abraham C . The challenges of interventions to promote healthier food in independent takeaways in England: qualitative study of intervention deliverers' views. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):184. PMC: 5787327. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5096-3. View

Bennett R, Zorbas C, Huse O, Peeters A, Cameron A, Sacks G . Prevalence of healthy and unhealthy food and beverage price promotions and their potential influence on shopper purchasing behaviour: A systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2019; 21(1):e12948. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12948. View

Gale R, Wu J, Erhardt T, Bounthavong M, Reardon C, Damschroder L . Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration. Implement Sci. 2019; 14(1):11. PMC: 6359833. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0853-y. View

Dhuria P, Lawrence W, Crozier S, Cooper C, Baird J, Vogel C . Women's perceptions of factors influencing their food shopping choices and how supermarkets can support them to make healthier choices. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):1070. PMC: 8178895. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11112-0. View

Espinosa R, Nassar A . The Acceptability of Food Policies. Nutrients. 2021; 13(5). PMC: 8145031. DOI: 10.3390/nu13051483. View

10.

Boys K, Haynes-Maslow L, McGuirt J, Ammerman A, Van Fleet E, Johnson N . Perceived barriers and facilitators to participating in the North Carolina Healthy Food Small Retailer Program: a mixed-methods examination considering investment effectiveness. Public Health Nutr. 2021; 24(18):6555-6565. PMC: 11148602. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980021003955. View

11.

Horsley J, Absalom K, Akiens E, Dunk R, Ferguson A . The proportion of unhealthy foodstuffs children are exposed to at the checkout of convenience supermarkets. Public Health Nutr. 2014; 17(11):2453-8. PMC: 10282326. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980013003571. View

12.

McGill E, Marks D, Er V, Penney T, Petticrew M, Egan M . Qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective: A systematic review and framework for public health evaluators. PLoS Med. 2020; 17(11):e1003368. PMC: 7605618. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003368. View

13.

Burman C, Aphane M . Leadership emergence: the application of the Cynefin framework during a bio-social HIV/AIDS risk-reduction pilot. Afr J AIDS Res. 2016; 15(3):249-60. DOI: 10.2989/16085906.2016.1198821. View

14.

Black C, Ntani G, Inskip H, Cooper C, Cummins S, Moon G . Measuring the healthfulness of food retail stores: variations by store type and neighbourhood deprivation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11:69. PMC: 4132210. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-69. View

15.

Rutter H, Savona N, Glonti K, Bibby J, Cummins S, Finegood D . The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. Lancet. 2017; 390(10112):2602-2604. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31267-9. View

16.

Vogel C, Crozier S, Dhuria P, Shand C, Lawrence W, Cade J . Protocol of a natural experiment to evaluate a supermarket intervention to improve food purchasing and dietary behaviours of women (WRAPPED study) in England: a prospective matched controlled cluster design. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(2):e036758. PMC: 7044911. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036758. View

17.

Cullerton K, Patay D, Waller M, Adsett E, Lee A . Competing public narratives in nutrition policy: insights into the ideational barriers of public support for regulatory nutrition measures. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022; 20(1):86. PMC: 9361541. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00891-6. View

18.

Watson D, Baralle N, Alagil J, Anil K, Ciccognani S, Dewar-Haggart R . How do we engage people in testing for COVID-19? A rapid qualitative evaluation of a testing programme in schools, GP surgeries and a university. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):305. PMC: 8842975. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12657-4. View

19.

Vogel C, Ntani G, Inskip H, Barker M, Cummins S, Cooper C . Education and the Relationship Between Supermarket Environment and Diet. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51(2):e27-e34. PMC: 4959574. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.030. View

20.

Barker D, Barker M, Fleming T, Lampl M . Developmental biology: Support mothers to secure future public health. Nature. 2013; 504(7479):209-11. DOI: 10.1038/504209a. View