» Articles » PMID: 34090410

Women's Perceptions of Factors Influencing Their Food Shopping Choices and How Supermarkets Can Support Them to Make Healthier Choices

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Jun 6
PMID 34090410
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To examine women's perceptions of factors that influence their food shopping choices, particularly in relation to store layout, and their views on ways that supermarkets could support healthier choices.

Design: This qualitative cross-sectional study used semi-structured telephone interviews to ask participants the reasons for their choice of supermarket and factors in-store that prompted their food selections. The actions supermarkets, governments and customers could take to encourage healthier food choices were explored with women. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes.

Setting: Six supermarkets across England.

Participants: Twenty women customers aged 18-45 years.

Results: Participants had a median age of 39.5 years (IQR: 35.1, 42.3), a median weekly grocery spend of £70 (IQR: 50, 88), and 44% had left school aged 16 years. Women reported that achieving value for money, feeling hungry, tired, or stressed, and meeting family members' food preferences influenced their food shopping choices. The physical environment was important, including product quality and variety, plus ease of accessing the store or products in-store. Many participants described how they made unintended food selections as a result of prominent placement of unhealthy products in supermarkets, even if they adopted more conscious approaches to food shopping (i.e. written or mental lists). Participants described healthy eating as a personal responsibility, but some stated that governments and supermarkets could be more supportive.

Conclusions: This study highlighted that in-store environments can undermine intentions to purchase and consume healthy foods. Creating healthier supermarket environments could reduce the burden of personal responsibility for healthy eating, by making healthier choices easier. Future research could explore the interplay of personal, societal and commercial responsibility for food choices and health status.

Citing Articles

"If government is saying the regulations are important, they should be putting in funding to back it up."- An in-depth analysis of local authority officers' perspectives of the Food (Promotion and Placement) (England) Regulations 2021.

Dhuria P, Muir S, Jenner S, Roe E, Lawrence W, Baird J BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):514.

PMID: 39506702 PMC: 11539601. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03720-5.


' - Australian shoppers' experiences with online grocery platforms.

Bennett R, Driessen C, Zorbas C, Sacks G, Gupta A, Cameron A Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e134.

PMID: 38742445 PMC: 11148825. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024001046.


Beyond individual responsibility: Exploring lay understandings of the contribution of environments on personal trajectories of obesity.

Serrano-Fuentes N, Rogers A, Portillo M PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302927.

PMID: 38718062 PMC: 11078422. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302927.


Women Consumers' Views on Legislation to Restrict Prominent Placement and Multibuy Promotions of High Fat, Sugar, and Salt Products in England: A Qualitative Perspective.

Dhuria P, Muir S, Lawrence W, Roe E, Crozier S, Cooper C Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024; 12():7597.

PMID: 38618804 PMC: 10590244. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7597.


Real-life experiments in supermarkets to encourage healthy dietary-related behaviours: opportunities, challenges and lessons learned.

Vogel C, Dijkstra C, Huitink M, Dhuria P, Poelman M, Mackenbach J Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023; 20(1):73.

PMID: 37340326 PMC: 10280909. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01448-8.


References
1.
Niederdeppe J, Roh S, Shapiro M . Acknowledging individual responsibility while emphasizing social determinants in narratives to promote obesity-reducing public policy: a randomized experiment. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0117565. PMC: 4338108. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117565. View

2.
Glanz K, Sallis J, Saelens B, Frank L . Healthy nutrition environments: concepts and measures. Am J Health Promot. 2005; 19(5):330-3, ii. DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-19.5.330. View

3.
Winkler L, Christensen U, Glumer C, Bloch P, Mikkelsen B, Wansink B . Substituting sugar confectionery with fruit and healthy snacks at checkout - a win-win strategy for consumers and food stores? a study on consumer attitudes and sales effects of a healthy supermarket intervention. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16(1):1184. PMC: 5120526. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3849-4. View

4.
Shaw S, Ntani G, Baird J, Vogel C . A systematic review of the influences of food store product placement on dietary-related outcomes. Nutr Rev. 2020; 78(12):1030-1045. PMC: 7666915. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa024. View

5.
Barker M, Dombrowski S, Colbourn T, Fall C, Kriznik N, Lawrence W . Intervention strategies to improve nutrition and health behaviours before conception. Lancet. 2018; 391(10132):1853-1864. PMC: 6075694. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30313-1. View