» Articles » PMID: 36699126

Towards Evolutionary Predictions: Current Promises and Challenges

Abstract

Evolution has traditionally been a historical and descriptive science, and predicting future evolutionary processes has long been considered impossible. However, evolutionary predictions are increasingly being developed and used in medicine, agriculture, biotechnology and conservation biology. Evolutionary predictions may be used for different purposes, such as to prepare for the future, to try and change the course of evolution or to determine how well we understand evolutionary processes. Similarly, the exact aspect of the evolved population that we want to predict may also differ. For example, we could try to predict which genotype will dominate, the fitness of the population or the extinction probability of a population. In addition, there are many uses of evolutionary predictions that may not always be recognized as such. The main goal of this review is to increase awareness of methods and data in different research fields by showing the breadth of situations in which evolutionary predictions are made. We describe how diverse evolutionary predictions share a common structure described by the predictive scope, time scale and precision. Then, by using examples ranging from SARS-CoV2 and influenza to CRISPR-based gene drives and sustainable product formation in biotechnology, we discuss the methods for predicting evolution, the factors that affect predictability and how predictions can be used to prevent evolution in undesirable directions or to promote beneficial evolution (i.e. evolutionary control). We hope that this review will stimulate collaboration between fields by establishing a common language for evolutionary predictions.

Citing Articles

Divergence time and environmental similarity predict the strength of morphological convergence in stick and leaf insects.

Boisseau R, Bradler S, Emlen D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 122(1):e2319485121.

PMID: 39715436 PMC: 11725862. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2319485121.


Extending evolutionary forecasts across bacterial species.

Pentz J, Biswas A, Alsaed B, Lind P Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2036):20242312.

PMID: 39657800 PMC: 11631409. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2312.


Using the Constrained Disorder Principle to Navigate Uncertainties in Biology and Medicine: Refining Fuzzy Algorithms.

Ilan Y Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 39452139 PMC: 11505099. DOI: 10.3390/biology13100830.


Distinguishing mutants that resist drugs via different mechanisms by examining fitness tradeoffs.

Schmidlin K, Apodaca S, Newell D, Sastokas A, Kinsler G, Geiler-Samerotte K Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39255191 PMC: 11386965. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.94144.


Predictability of ecological and evolutionary dynamics in a changing world.

Bozzuto C, Ives A Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2026):20240980.

PMID: 38981521 PMC: 11335013. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0980.


References
1.
Mueller J, Partecke J, Hatchwell B, Gaston K, Evans K . Candidate gene polymorphisms for behavioural adaptations during urbanization in blackbirds. Mol Ecol. 2013; 22(13):3629-37. DOI: 10.1111/mec.12288. View

2.
Pelabon C, Albertsen E, Le Rouzic A, Firmat C, Bolstad G, Armbruster W . Quantitative assessment of observed versus predicted responses to selection. Evolution. 2021; 75(9):2217-2236. DOI: 10.1111/evo.14284. View

3.
Joyce P, Rokyta D, Beisel C, Orr H . A general extreme value theory model for the adaptation of DNA sequences under strong selection and weak mutation. Genetics. 2008; 180(3):1627-43. PMC: 2581963. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.088716. View

4.
Rocheleau G, Brumme C, Shoveller J, Lima V, Harrigan P . Longitudinal trends of HIV drug resistance in a large Canadian cohort, 1996-2016. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017; 24(2):185-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.06.014. View

5.
Hughes A, Inouye B, Johnson M, Underwood N, Vellend M . Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol Lett. 2008; 11(6):609-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01179.x. View