» Articles » PMID: 36698473

Quality Assessment of Pre- and Postnatal Nutrition and Exercise Mobile Applications in the United States and China

Overview
Journal Front Nutr
Date 2023 Jan 26
PMID 36698473
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mobile applications (apps) are becoming increasingly prevalent as tools for improving maternal health behaviors. However, the recently updated content and quality of these apps remain unknown. This research investigated the fundamental characteristics, functional modules, and overall quality of maternal apps available in the United States and China to reveal critical nutrition and physical activity gaps.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in Android and iOS app stores (China and the United States). Apps were eligible if they targeted pregnant or postpartum women, focused on nutrition or physical activity, and had interfaces in English or Chinese. The basic characteristics, functional modules, and overall quality of the apps were evaluated, and differences between apps available in China or the United States were determined using analysis of variance and chi-square tests. Pearson correlations were utilized to investigate links between objective quality and user rating.

Results: A total of 65 maternity-related nutrition and physical activity apps (34 from China and 31 from the United States) were eligible. Among them, 68% (21/31) of US apps and 56% (19/34) of Chinese apps did not provide supporting evidence for their content. A greater number of Chinese apps provided app-based general education modules, namely food nutrition knowledge ( = 0, 0% in the United States vs. = 30, 88.2% in China). Meanwhile, a greater number of US apps provided exercise modules, namely pregnancy yoga ( = 21, 67.7% in the United States vs. = 2, 5.9% in China). The overall app quality rating in the United States was lower than it was in China (mean: 3.5, SD: 0.6 in China vs. mean: 3.4, SD: 0.7 in the United States). There was no relationship between the overall app quality rating and the user rating in either country (rho = 0.11 in China and rho = -0.13 in the United States).

Conclusion: The characteristics and functional modules of in-store apps for maternal nutrition and physical activity differed between the United States and China. Both countries' apps, especially Chinese apps, lacked evidence-based information, and there was no correlation between app quality and user rating. The results therefore suggest that user ratings cannot be used as an objective indicator of app quality and that it is necessary to improve the empirical basis and credibility of apps in both countries.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Quality, Content Accuracy, and User Suitability of mHealth Prenatal Care Apps for Expectant Mothers: Critical Assessment Study.

Asadollahi F, Ebrahimzadeh Zagami S, Eslami S, Latifnejad Roudsari R Asian Pac Isl Nurs J. 2025; 9:e66852.

PMID: 39946714 PMC: 11888006. DOI: 10.2196/66852.


A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing In-Person, Remote, and Blended Interventions in Physical Activity, Diet, Education, and Behavioral Modification on Gestational Weight Gain among Overweight or Obese Pregnant Individuals.

Yu H, Li M, Qian G, Yue S, Ossowski Z, Szumilewicz A Adv Nutr. 2024; 15(7):100253.

PMID: 38879168 PMC: 11267029. DOI: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100253.


A research synthesis on successful educational practices and student outcomes for physical education in schools.

He J, Yu H, Jiang M, Bialas M Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1280871.

PMID: 37849483 PMC: 10577211. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1280871.

References
1.
Meuffels F, Isenmann E, Strube M, Lesch A, Oberste M, Brinkmann C . Exercise Interventions Combined With Dietary Supplements in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients-A Systematic Review of Relevant Health Outcomes. Front Nutr. 2022; 9:817724. PMC: 8959696. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.817724. View

2.
Jayasinghe S, Herath M, Beckett J, Ahuja K, Street S, Byrne N . Gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention in Tasmanian women: The Baby-bod Study. PLoS One. 2022; 17(3):e0264744. PMC: 8939821. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264744. View

3.
Yang X, Li H, Zhao Q, Han R, Xiang Z, Gao L . Clinical Practice Guidelines That Address Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021; 67(1):53-68. DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13286. View

4.
Cortez N, Cohen I, Kesselheim A . FDA regulation of mobile health technologies. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(4):372-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMhle1403384. View

5.
Sherifali D, Nerenberg K, Wilson S, Semeniuk K, Ali M, Redman L . The Effectiveness of eHealth Technologies on Weight Management in Pregnant and Postpartum Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(10):e337. PMC: 5660296. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8006. View