» Articles » PMID: 36696724

Quantitative Models of Auditory Cortical Processing

Overview
Journal Hear Res
Date 2023 Jan 25
PMID 36696724
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To generate insight from experimental data, it is critical to understand the inter-relationships between individual data points and place them in context within a structured framework. Quantitative modeling can provide the scaffolding for such an endeavor. Our main objective in this review is to provide a primer on the range of quantitative tools available to experimental auditory neuroscientists. Quantitative modeling is advantageous because it can provide a compact summary of observed data, make underlying assumptions explicit, and generate predictions for future experiments. Quantitative models may be developed to characterize or fit observed data, to test theories of how a task may be solved by neural circuits, to determine how observed biophysical details might contribute to measured activity patterns, or to predict how an experimental manipulation would affect neural activity. In complexity, quantitative models can range from those that are highly biophysically realistic and that include detailed simulations at the level of individual synapses, to those that use abstract and simplified neuron models to simulate entire networks. Here, we survey the landscape of recently developed models of auditory cortical processing, highlighting a small selection of models to demonstrate how they help generate insight into the mechanisms of auditory processing. We discuss examples ranging from models that use details of synaptic properties to explain the temporal pattern of cortical responses to those that use modern deep neural networks to gain insight into human fMRI data. We conclude by discussing a biologically realistic and interpretable model that our laboratory has developed to explore aspects of vocalization categorization in the auditory pathway.

Citing Articles

A general model unifying the adaptive, transient and sustained properties of ON and OFF auditory neural responses.

Rancon U, Masquelier T, Cottereau B PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(8):e1012288.

PMID: 39093852 PMC: 11324186. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012288.

References
1.
JEFFRESS L . A place theory of sound localization. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1948; 41(1):35-9. DOI: 10.1037/h0061495. View

2.
Bondanelli G, Deneux T, Bathellier B, Ostojic S . Network dynamics underlying OFF responses in the auditory cortex. Elife. 2021; 10. PMC: 8057817. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.53151. View

3.
Williamson R, Sahani M, Pillow J . The equivalence of information-theoretic and likelihood-based methods for neural dimensionality reduction. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015; 11(4):e1004141. PMC: 4382343. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004141. View

4.
Aertsen A, Olders J, Johannesma P . Spectro-temporal receptive fields of auditory neurons in the grassfrog. III. Analysis of the stimulus-event relation for natural stimuli. Biol Cybern. 1981; 39(3):195-209. DOI: 10.1007/BF00342772. View

5.
Calabrese A, Schumacher J, Schneider D, Paninski L, Woolley S . A generalized linear model for estimating spectrotemporal receptive fields from responses to natural sounds. PLoS One. 2011; 6(1):e16104. PMC: 3019175. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016104. View