» Articles » PMID: 36694946

Concordance Between Cancer Gene Alterations in Tumor and Circulating Tumor DNA Correlates with Poor Survival in a Real-world Precision-medicine Population

Overview
Journal Mol Oncol
Date 2023 Jan 25
PMID 36694946
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genomic analysis, performed on tumoral tissue DNA and on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood, is the cornerstone of precision cancer medicine. Herein, we characterized the clinical prognostic implications of the concordance of alterations in major cancer genes between tissue- and blood-derived DNA in a pan-cancer cohort. The molecular profiles of both liquid (Guardant Health) and tissue (Foundation Medicine) biopsies from 433 patients were analyzed. Mutations and amplifications of cancer genes scored by these two tests were assessed. In 184 (42.5%) patients, there was at least one mutual gene alteration. The mean number of mutual gene-level alterations in the samples was 0.67 per patient (range: 0-5). A higher mutual gene-level alteration number correlated with shorter overall survival (OS). As confirmed in multivariable analysis, patients with ≥2 mutual gene-level alterations in blood and tissue had a hazard ratio (HR) of death of 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1-2.2; P=0.047), whereas patients with ≥3 mutual gene-level alterations had an HR of death 2.38 (95% CI=1.47-3.87; P=0.0005). Together, our results show that gene-level concordance between tissue DNA and ctDNA analysis is prevalent and is an independent factor predicting significantly shorter patient survival.

Citing Articles

Cell-free tumor DNA analysis in advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients: mutation frequencies, testing intention, and clinical impact.

Huebner H, Wimberger P, Laakmann E, Ruckhaberle E, Ruebner M, Lehle S Precis Clin Med. 2025; 8(1):pbae034.

PMID: 39839709 PMC: 11748133. DOI: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbae034.

References
1.
Bieg-Bourne C, Okamura R, Kurzrock R . Concordance between TP53 alterations in blood and tissue: impact of time interval, biopsy site, cancer type and circulating tumor DNA burden. Mol Oncol. 2020; 14(6):1242-1251. PMC: 7266274. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12672. View

2.
Sicklick J, Kato S, Okamura R, Schwaederle M, Hahn M, Williams C . Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study. Nat Med. 2019; 25(5):744-750. PMC: 6553618. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0407-5. View

3.
Van Allen E, Wagle N, Stojanov P, Perrin D, Cibulskis K, Marlow S . Whole-exome sequencing and clinical interpretation of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples to guide precision cancer medicine. Nat Med. 2014; 20(6):682-8. PMC: 4048335. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3559. View

4.
Zill O, Greene C, Sebisanovic D, Siew L, Leng J, Vu M . Cell-Free DNA Next-Generation Sequencing in Pancreatobiliary Carcinomas. Cancer Discov. 2015; 5(10):1040-8. PMC: 4592417. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0274. View

5.
Drilon A, Laetsch T, Kummar S, Dubois S, Lassen U, Demetri G . Efficacy of Larotrectinib in TRK Fusion-Positive Cancers in Adults and Children. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(8):731-739. PMC: 5857389. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1714448. View