» Articles » PMID: 32187847

Concordance Between TP53 Alterations in Blood and Tissue: Impact of Time Interval, Biopsy Site, Cancer Type and Circulating Tumor DNA Burden

Overview
Journal Mol Oncol
Date 2020 Mar 19
PMID 32187847
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We examined the impact of spatial, temporal, histologic, and quantitative factors on concordance between TP53 alterations in tissue DNA vs in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Four hundred and thirty-three patients underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) in which both tissue and blood samples were evaluated. TP53 was detected in 258 of 433 patients (59.6%); 215 had tissue TP53 alterations (49.7%); 159, ctDNA (36.7%); and 116, both tissue and ctDNA (27.8%). Overall concordance rate between ctDNA and tissue biopsies for TP53 alterations was 67.2%; positive concordance was 45.0%. Overall concordance for TP53 did not vary among patients with ≤ 2 months vs > 6 months between test samples; however, positive concordance trended higher when time intervals between test samples were shorter, suggesting that the lack of difference in overall concordance may be due to the large number of negative/negative tests. There was a trend toward higher overall concordance based on biopsy site (metastatic vs primary) (P = 0.07) and significantly higher positive concordance if the tissue biopsy site was a metastatic lesion (P = 0.03). Positive concordance significantly decreased in noncolorectal cancer patients vs colorectal cancer patients (P = 0.02). Finally, higher %ctDNA was associated with higher concordance rates between blood and tissue (P < 0.001). Taken together, these data indicate that both blood and tissue DNA sequencing are necessary to evaluate the full scope of TP53 alterations, and that concordance rates may be related to multiple factors including, but not limited to, amount of ctDNA, histologic context, and site of tissue biopsy.

Citing Articles

Response of bilateral Wilms tumor to chemotherapy suggests histologic subtype and guides treatment.

Duncan C, Mothi S, Santiago T, Coggins J, Graetz D, Bishop M J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024; 116(8):1230-1237.

PMID: 38539045 PMC: 11308166. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae072.


Preoperative ctDNA Levels Are Associated With Poor Overall Survival in Patients With Ovarian Cancer.

Dobilas A, Chen Y, Brueffer C, Leandersson P, Saal L, Borgfeldt C Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2023; 20(6suppl):763-770.

PMID: 38035709 PMC: 10687736. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20423.


Plasma ctDNA increases tissue NGS-based detection of therapeutically targetable mutations in lung cancers.

Xie J, Yao W, Chen L, Zhu W, Liu Q, Geng G BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):294.

PMID: 37004022 PMC: 10063947. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10674-z.


Uterine Cavity Lavage Mutation Analysis in Lithuanian Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Zilovic D, Vaicekauskaite I, ciurliene R, Sabaliauskaite R, Jarmalaite S Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36765826 PMC: 9913062. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030868.


Concordance between cancer gene alterations in tumor and circulating tumor DNA correlates with poor survival in a real-world precision-medicine population.

Rosenberg S, Ben Cohen G, Kato S, Okamura R, Lippman S, Kurzrock R Mol Oncol. 2023; 17(9):1844-1856.

PMID: 36694946 PMC: 10483598. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13383.


References
1.
Grasselli J, Elez E, Caratu G, Matito J, Santos C, Macarulla T . Concordance of blood- and tumor-based detection of RAS mutations to guide anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017; 28(6):1294-1301. PMC: 5834108. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx112. View

2.
Frampton G, Fichtenholtz A, Otto G, Wang K, Downing S, He J . Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31(11):1023-31. PMC: 5710001. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2696. View

3.
Macconaill L . Existing and emerging technologies for tumor genomic profiling. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(15):1815-24. PMC: 3808234. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.5948. View

4.
Stetson D, Ahmed A, Xu X, Nuttall B, Lubinski T, Johnson J . Orthogonal Comparison of Four Plasma NGS Tests With Tumor Suggests Technical Factors are a Major Source of Assay Discordance. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022; 3:1-9. DOI: 10.1200/PO.18.00191. View

5.
Solomon H, Dinowitz N, Pateras I, Cooks T, Shetzer Y, Molchadsky A . Mutant p53 gain of function underlies high expression levels of colorectal cancer stem cells markers. Oncogene. 2018; 37(12):1669-1684. PMC: 6448595. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-017-0060-8. View