» Articles » PMID: 36691325

Surgical Safety Analysis and Clinical Experience Sharing of Myasthenia Gravis Patients Aged 65 and over

Overview
Journal Thorac Cancer
Date 2023 Jan 24
PMID 36691325
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To evaluate the surgical safety in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients aged 65 and over.

Methods: A total of 564 patients with MG who underwent surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Beijing Hospital from November 2011 to March 2022 were included in the study and divided into two groups taking the age of 65 as the boundary. Perioperative data of patients were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results: Compared with young patients, FEV1, FEV1% and MVV in lung function of elderly MG patients were worse (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.002). Postoperative drainage time was longer (p < 0.001), combined with more drainage volume (p = 0.002). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of elderly MG patients was higher (p < 0.001). Complications were more likely to occur (p = 0.008) after surgery and Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) of postoperative complications was also higher (p = 0.003). Meanwhile, postoperative myasthenic crisis (POMC) was more likely to occur (p = 0.038). Logistic regression showed that lower DLCO% (p = 0.049) was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications.

Conclusions: Surgical indications should be considered in each elderly MG patient on an individual basis. Moreover, most elderly MG patients safely survive the perioperative period and benefit from surgery through individualized consideration.

Citing Articles

Thymoma resection and myasthenia gravis: what is the neurological outcome in patients older than 65 years?.

Lococo F, Sassorossi C, Maurizi G, Santoro G, Iorio R, Falso S Updates Surg. 2024; .

PMID: 38980595 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01937-w.


Surgical safety analysis and clinical experience sharing of myasthenia gravis patients aged 65 and over.

Jiao P, Wu F, Wu J, Sun Y, Tian W, Yu H Thorac Cancer. 2023; 14(8):717-723.

PMID: 36691325 PMC: 10008675. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14799.

References
1.
Zielinski M, Hauer L, Hauer J, Pankowski J, Nabialek T, Szlubowski A . Comparison of complete remission rates after 5 year follow-up of three different techniques of thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 37(5):1137-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.11.029. View

2.
Li H, Ruan Z, Gao F, Zhou H, Guo R, Sun C . Thymectomy and Risk of Generalization in Patients with Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Neurotherapeutics. 2021; 18(4):2449-2457. PMC: 8804035. DOI: 10.1007/s13311-021-01129-z. View

3.
Tamura S, Sugawara Y, Kaneko J, Yamashiki N, Kishi Y, Matsui Y . Systematic grading of surgical complications in live liver donors according to Clavien's system. Transpl Int. 2006; 19(12):982-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00375.x. View

4.
Matsuzaki Y, Tomita M, Onitsuka T, Shibata K . Influence of age on extended thymectomy as a treatment for myasthenia gravis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 4(4):192-5. View

5.
Grob D, Brunner N, Namba T, Pagala M . Lifetime course of myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2007; 37(2):141-9. DOI: 10.1002/mus.20950. View