» Articles » PMID: 36685023

Serum Pepsinogen Level As a Biomarker for Atrophy, Reflux Esophagitis, and Gastric Cancer Screening in Indonesia

Abstract

Background: Chronic dyspepsia's symptoms are frequently seen in primary to tertiary healthcare in Indonesia. This study aimed to describe the potential usability of pepsinogen (PG) values in determining gastric mucosal conditions, including superficial gastritis and atrophic gastritis.

Materials And Methods: We recruited 646 adult dyspeptic patients and then analyzed PG values (including PGI, PGII, and PGI/II ratio) with endoscopic findings, gastric mucosal damages, and infection. The gastric mucosal damage and infection were evaluated using histological examination based on the updated Sydney system.

Results: Among 646 enrolled patients, 308 (47.2%), 212 (32.8%), 91 (14.1%), 34 (5.2%), and 1 (0.2%) patient were diagnosed with normal mucosa, gastritis, reflux esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric cancer, respectively. Significant differences in PGI, PGII, and PGI/II ratio values were observed among ethnic groups (all < 0.01). The PGI and PGII levels were significantly higher and PGI/II was significantly lower in -infected patients than in uninfected ones (all < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value for PGII and PGI/II was 12.45 ng/mL with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.755 (0.702-0.811), sensitivity 59.3%, and specificity 77.1%; and 4.75 with AUC value of 0.821 (0.763-0.855), sensitivity 81.5%, and specificity 78.7%, respectively, to determine moderate-severe atrophy.

Conclusion: Serum PG levels, a useful biomarker, represent the endoscopic findings, especially for reflux esophagitis. In addition, the benefits of PG values detecting atrophic gastritis were limited to moderate-severe atrophic gastritis. This usefulness requires careful attention for several ethnic groups in Indonesia.

Citing Articles

Non-Invasive Markers for the Detection of Gastric Precancerous Conditions.

Romanczyk M, Osmola M, Link A, Druet A, Hemont C, Martin J Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(12).

PMID: 38927959 PMC: 11202181. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122254.

References
1.
Sasazuki S . The ABC Method and Gastric Cancer: Evidence From Prospective Studies. J Epidemiol. 2016; 26(12):611-612. PMC: 5121428. DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20160140. View

2.
Miftahussurur M, Syam A, Nusi I, Makmun D, Waskito L, Zein L . Surveillance of Helicobacter pylori Antibiotic Susceptibility in Indonesia: Different Resistance Types among Regions and with Novel Genetic Mutations. PLoS One. 2016; 11(12):e0166199. PMC: 5131997. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166199. View

3.
Yin Y, Li Y, Chen Y, Zhang D . [Application of Digestive Endoscopy in Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori Infection]. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2018; 40(4):563-567. DOI: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.10192. View

4.
Fahey M, Hamada G, Nishimoto I, Kowalski L, Iriya K, Gama-Rodrigues J . Ethnic differences in serum pepsinogen levels among Japanese and non-Japanese Brazilian gastric cancer patients and controls. Cancer Detect Prev. 2001; 24(6):564-71. View

5.
Lee S, Lee S, Kim J, Sung I, Park H, Shim C . Link between Serum Pepsinogen Concentrations and Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Findings. J Korean Med Sci. 2017; 32(5):796-802. PMC: 5383612. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.796. View