» Articles » PMID: 36672655

Artificial Intelligence Assisted Computational Tomographic Detection of Lung Nodules for Prognostic Cancer Examination: A Large-Scale Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2023 Jan 21
PMID 36672655
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has emerged as a standard method for detecting early-stage lung cancer. However, the tedious computer tomography (CT) slide reading, patient-by-patient check, and lack of standard criteria to determine the vague but possible nodule leads to variable outcomes of CT slide interpretation. To determine the artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted CT examination, AI algorithm-assisted CT screening was embedded in the hospital picture archiving and communication system, and a 200 person-scaled clinical trial was conducted at two medical centers. With AI algorithm-assisted CT screening, the sensitivity of detecting nodules sized 4−5 mm, 6~10 mm, 11~20 mm, and >20 mm increased by 41%, 11.2%, 10.3%, and 18.7%, respectively. Remarkably, the overall sensitivity of detecting varied nodules increased by 20.7% from 67.7% to 88.4%. Furthermore, the sensitivity increased by 18.5% from 72.5% to 91% for detecting ground glass nodules (GGN), which is challenging for radiologists and physicians. The free-response operating characteristic (FROC) AI score was ≥0.4, and the AI algorithm standalone CT screening sensitivity reached >95% with an area under the localization receiver operating characteristic curve (LROC-AUC) of >0.88. Our study demonstrates that AI algorithm-embedded CT screening significantly ameliorates tedious LDCT practices for doctors.

Citing Articles

A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.

Kotoulas S, Spyratos D, Porpodis K, Domvri K, Boutou A, Kaimakamis E Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075729 PMC: 11898928. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050882.


Effect of emphysema on AI software and human reader performance in lung nodule detection from low-dose chest CT.

Sourlos N, Pelgrim G, Wisselink H, Yang X, de Jonge G, Rook M Eur Radiol Exp. 2024; 8(1):63.

PMID: 38764066 PMC: 11102890. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00459-9.


ERS International Congress 2023: highlights from the Clinical Techniques, Imaging and Endoscopy Assembly.

Moretti A, Pietersen P, Hassan M, Shafiek H, Prosch H, Tarnoki A ERJ Open Res. 2024; 10(1).

PMID: 38410712 PMC: 10895430. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00836-2023.

References
1.
Mazzone P, Silvestri G, Souter L, Caverly T, Kanne J, Katki H . Screening for Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2021; 160(5):e427-e494. PMC: 8727886. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.063. View

2.
Chao H, Wu Y, Siana L, Chen Y . Generating High-Resolution CT Slices from Two Image Series Using Deep-Learning-Based Resolution Enhancement Methods. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(11). PMC: 9689374. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112725. View

3.
Cui S, Ming S, Lin Y, Chen F, Shen Q, Li H . Development and clinical application of deep learning model for lung nodules screening on CT images. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):13657. PMC: 7423892. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70629-3. View

4.
Peloschek P, Sailer J, Weber M, Herold C, Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop C . Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering of 3D multidetector CT data. Radiology. 2007; 243(2):561-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2432052052. View

5.
Beyer F, Zierott L, Fallenberg E, Juergens K, Stoeckel J, Heindel W . Comparison of sensitivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17(11):2941-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0667-1. View