» Articles » PMID: 36669106

MITE Infestation Accommodated by Genome Editing in the Germline Genome of the Ciliate

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Jan 20
PMID 36669106
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During their development following sexual conjugation, ciliates excise numerous internal eliminated sequences (IESs) from a copy of the germline genome to produce the functional somatic genome. Most IESs are thought to have originated from transposons, but the presumed homology is often obscured by sequence decay. To obtain more representative perspectives on the nature of IESs and ciliate genome editing, we assembled 40,000 IESs of , a species belonging to a lineage (Heterotrichea) that diverged early from those of the intensively studied model ciliate species. About a quarter of IESs were short (<115 bp), largely nonrepetitive, and with a pronounced ~10 bp periodicity in length; the remainder were longer (up to 7 kbp) and nonperiodic and contained abundant interspersed repeats. Contrary to the expectation from current models, the assembled germline genome encodes few transposases. Instead, its most abundant repeat (8,000 copies) is a Miniature Inverted-repeat Transposable Element (MITE), apparently a deletion derivative of a germline-limited Pogo-family transposon. We hypothesize that MITEs are an important source of IESs whose proliferation is eventually self-limiting and that rather than defending the germline genomes against mobile elements, transposase domestication actually facilitates the accumulation of junk DNA.

Citing Articles

Genome-Wide Tool for Sensitive de novo Identification and Visualisation of Interspersed and Tandem Repeats.

Kalendar R, Kairov U Bioinform Biol Insights. 2024; 18:11779322241306391.

PMID: 39703748 PMC: 11656428. DOI: 10.1177/11779322241306391.


ISWI1 complex proteins facilitate developmental genome editing in .

Singh A, Haussermann L, Emmerich C, Nischwitz E, Seah B, Seah B Genome Res. 2024; 35(1):93-108.

PMID: 39542647 PMC: 11789628. DOI: 10.1101/gr.278402.123.


Nuclear dualism without extensive DNA elimination in the ciliate .

Seah B, Singh A, Vetter D, Emmerich C, Peters M, Soltys V Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(39):e2400503121.

PMID: 39298487 PMC: 11441545. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2400503121.


Hijackers, hitchhikers, or co-drivers? The mysteries of mobilizable genetic elements.

Ares-Arroyo M, Coluzzi C, Moura de Sousa J, Rocha E PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(8):e3002796.

PMID: 39208359 PMC: 11389934. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002796.


How ciliates got their nuclei.

Boscaro V, Keeling P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(7):e2221818120.

PMID: 36763531 PMC: 9963403. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2221818120.


References
1.
Feng Y, Landweber L . Transposon debris in ciliate genomes. PLoS Biol. 2021; 19(8):e3001354. PMC: 8384191. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001354. View

2.
Zahler A, Neeb Z, Lin A, Katzman S . Mating of the stichotrichous ciliate Oxytricha trifallax induces production of a class of 27 nt small RNAs derived from the parental macronucleus. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e42371. PMC: 3416858. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042371. View

3.
Han J . Non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons: mechanisms, recent developments, and unanswered questions. Mob DNA. 2010; 1(1):15. PMC: 2881922. DOI: 10.1186/1759-8753-1-15. View

4.
Stanke M, Waack S . Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19 Suppl 2:ii215-25. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1080. View

5.
Flynn J, Hubley R, Goubert C, Rosen J, Clark A, Feschotte C . RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(17):9451-9457. PMC: 7196820. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1921046117. View