» Articles » PMID: 36658291

Alcohol-induced Deficits in Reactive Control of Response Selection and Inhibition Are Counteracted by a Seemingly Paradox Increase in Proactive Control

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Jan 19
PMID 36658291
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High-dose alcohol intoxication reduces cognitive control, including inhibition. Although inhibition deficits may contribute to the behavioral deficits commonly observed in alcohol use disorder (AUD), many questions about potentially modulating factors have remained unanswered. We examined the effects of experimentally induced high-dose alcohol intoxication (~ 1.1 ‰) on the interplay between controlled vs. automatic response selection and inhibition in healthy young men. A holistic EEG-based theta activity analysis that considered both reactive control during task performance and preceding proactive control processes was run. It revealed a previously unknown seesaw relationship, with decreased reactive control, but paradoxically increased proactive control. Most importantly, alcohol-induced increases in proactive occipital theta band power were associated with reductions in negative alcohol effects on reactive control processes associated with decreased activity in the SMA and medial frontal cortex. Our findings demonstrate that research should not solely focus on immediate effects during task performance. Aside from differential neurobiochemical and neuroanatomical effects of alcohol, it is also conceivable that proactive control may have been recruited in a (secondary) response to compensate for alcohol-induced impairments in reactive control. Against this background, it could be promising to investigate changes in such compensatory mechanisms in pronounced alcohol-associated inhibition deficits, like in AUD patients.

Citing Articles

Effects of Catecholaminergic and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Response Inhibition.

Koyun A, Wendiggensen P, Roessner V, Beste C, Stock A Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024; 27(6).

PMID: 38742426 PMC: 11184454. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyae023.


Proactive Versus Reactive Control Strategies Differentially Mediate Alcohol Drinking in Male Wistars and P Rats.

Morningstar M, Timme N, Ma B, Cornwell E, Galbari T, Lapish C eNeuro. 2024; 11(3).

PMID: 38423790 PMC: 10972740. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0385-23.2024.

References
1.
Stock A, Schulz T, Lenhardt M, Blaszkewicz M, Beste C . High-dose alcohol intoxication differentially modulates cognitive subprocesses involved in response inhibition. Addict Biol. 2014; 21(1):136-45. DOI: 10.1111/adb.12170. View

2.
Beaton L, Azma S, Marinkovic K . When the brain changes its mind: Oscillatory dynamics of conflict processing and response switching in a flanker task during alcohol challenge. PLoS One. 2018; 13(1):e0191200. PMC: 5766228. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191200. View

3.
Chmielewski W, Muckschel M, Beste C . Response selection codes in neurophysiological data predict conjoint effects of controlled and automatic processes during response inhibition. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 39(4):1839-1849. PMC: 6866562. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23974. View

4.
Battistoni E, Stein T, Peelen M . Preparatory attention in visual cortex. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017; 1396(1):92-107. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13320. View

5.
Mirabella G, Mancini C, Valente F, Cardona F . Children with primary complex motor stereotypies show impaired reactive but not proactive inhibition. Cortex. 2020; 124:250-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.004. View