» Articles » PMID: 36650592

What Can Implementation Science Offer Civil Society in Their Efforts to Drive Rights-based Health Reform?

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Jan 17
PMID 36650592
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over the years, civil society organizations (CSOs) have made tremendous efforts to ensure that state policies, programmes, and actions facilitate equitable access to healthcare. While CSOs are key actors in the realization of the right to health, a systematic understanding of how CSOs achieve policy change is lacking. Implementation science, a discipline focused on the methods and strategies facilitating the uptake of evidence-based practice and research can bring relevant, untapped methodologies to understand how CSOs drive health reforms. This article argues for the use of evidence-based strategies to enhance civil society action. We hold that implementation science can offer an actionable frame to aid CSOs in deciphering the mechanisms and conditions in which to pursue rights-based actions most effectively. More empirical studies are needed to generate evidence and CSOs have already indicated the need for more data-driven solutions to empower activists to hold policymakers to account. Although implementation science may not resolve all the challenges CSOs face, its frameworks and approaches can provide an innovative way for organizations to chart out a course for reform.

Citing Articles

Patterns of Screen Time From Ages 2 to 6-7 Years in South Brazil: A Prospective Study.

de Andrade Leao O, Flores T, de Oliveira Nava D, Soares P, Murray J, Domingues M Child Care Health Dev. 2025; 51(1):e70033.

PMID: 39778873 PMC: 11710921. DOI: 10.1111/cch.70033.


Challenges for research uptake for health policymaking and practice in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Semahegn A, Manyazewal T, Hanlon C, Getachew E, Fekadu B, Assefa E Health Res Policy Syst. 2023; 21(1):131.

PMID: 38057873 PMC: 10699029. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01084-5.

References
1.
Nilsen P . Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015; 10:53. PMC: 4406164. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0. View

2.
Glasgow R, Eckstein E, ElZarrad M . Implementation science perspectives and opportunities for HIV/AIDS research: integrating science, practice, and policy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013; 63 Suppl 1:S26-31. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182920286. View

3.
Parker R, Perez-Brumer A, Garcia J, Gavigan K, Ramirez A, Milnor J . Prevention literacy: community-based advocacy for access and ownership of the HIV prevention toolkit. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016; 19(1):21092. PMC: 5045969. DOI: 10.7448/IAS.19.1.21092. View

4.
Jull J, Giles A, Graham I . Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implement Sci. 2017; 12(1):150. PMC: 5735911. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3. View

5.
Bauer M, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, Kilbourne A . An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol. 2015; 3:32. PMC: 4573926. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9. View