» Articles » PMID: 25355087

Outcomes of a Partnered Facilitation Strategy to Implement Primary Care-mental Health

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Oct 31
PMID 25355087
Citations 147
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Implementing new programs and practices is challenging, even when they are mandated. Implementation Facilitation (IF) strategies that focus on partnering with sites show promise for addressing these challenges.

Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an external/internal IF strategy within the context of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mandate of Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI).

Design: This was a quasi-experimental, Hybrid Type III study. Generalized estimating equations assessed differences across sites.

Participants: Patients and providers at seven VA primary care clinics receiving the IF intervention and national support and seven matched comparison clinics receiving national support only participated in the study.

Intervention: We used a highly partnered IF strategy incorporating evidence-based implementation interventions.

Main Measures: We evaluated the IF strategy using VA administrative data and RE-AIM framework measures for two 6-month periods.

Key Results: Evaluation of RE-AIM measures from the first 6-month period indicated that PC patients at IF clinics had nine times the odds (OR=8.93, p<0.001) of also being seen in PC-MHI (Reach) compared to patients at non-IF clinics. PC providers at IF clinics had seven times the odds (OR=7.12, p=0.029) of referring patients to PC-MHI (Adoption) than providers at non-IF clinics, and a greater proportion of providers' patients at IF clinics were referred to PC-MHI (Adoption) compared to non-IF clinics (β=0.027, p<0.001). Compared to PC patients at non-IF sites, patients at IF clinics did not have lower odds (OR=1.34, p=0.232) of being referred for first-time mental health specialty clinic visits (Effectiveness), or higher odds (OR=1.90, p=0.350) of receiving same-day access (Implementation). Assessment of program sustainability (Maintenance) was conducted by repeating this analysis for a second 6-month time period. Maintenance analyses results were similar to the earlier period.

Conclusion: The addition of a highly partnered IF strategy to national level support resulted in greater Reach and Adoption of the mandated PC-MHI initiative, thereby increasing patient access to VA mental health care.

Citing Articles

Assessing the comparative effectiveness of ECHO and coaching implementation strategies in a jail/provider MOUD implementation trial.

Molfenter T, Vechinski J, Kim J, Zhang J, Meng L, Tveit J Implement Sci. 2025; 20(1):7.

PMID: 39901259 PMC: 11792685. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-025-01419-6.


A randomized controlled trial of the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian dysfunction implemented via facilitation and delivered by community mental health providers: Improving the "fit" of psychological treatments by adapting to....

Harvey A, Agnew E, Hache R, Spencer J, Diaz M, Patino E Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 39764095 PMC: 11703346. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5422372/v1.


Aligning implementation research and clinical operations: a partnership to promote implementation research in primary care.

Chepp V, Masiano S, Scarcipino M, Hudak A, Steinel E, Babiuch C BMJ Open Qual. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 39532387 PMC: 11555095. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002879.


Transition Guide Dissemination to Foster Patient-Care Team Conversations: A Childhood Arthritis Rheumatology Research Alliance Transition Learning Collaborative Pilot Implementation Study.

Chang J, Alonzi G, Sears C, Bitencourt N, Hernandez A, Peterson R ACR Open Rheumatol. 2024; 7(1):e11753.

PMID: 39381857 PMC: 11667757. DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11753.


Collaborating to heal addiction and mental health in primary care (CHAMP): A protocol for a hybrid type 2a trial.

Fortney J, Ratzliff A, Blanchard B, Ferro L, Rouvere J, Chase E Contemp Clin Trials. 2024; 146():107700.

PMID: 39322115 PMC: 11584174. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107700.


References
1.
Parker L, Kirchner J, Bonner L, Fickel J, Ritchie M, Simons C . Creating a quality-improvement dialogue: utilizing knowledge from frontline staff, managers, and experts to foster health care quality improvement. Qual Health Res. 2008; 19(2):229-42. DOI: 10.1177/1049732308329481. View

2.
Dogherty E, Harrison M, Baker C, Graham I . Following a natural experiment of guideline adaptation and early implementation: a mixed-methods study of facilitation. Implement Sci. 2012; 7:9. PMC: 3296591. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-9. View

3.
Kirchner J, Parker L, Bonner L, Fickel J, Yano E, Ritchie M . Roles of managers, frontline staff and local champions, in implementing quality improvement: stakeholders' perspectives. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010; 18(1):63-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01518.x. View

4.
Harvey G, Loftus-Hills A, Rycroft-Malone J, Titchen A, Kitson A, McCormack B . Getting evidence into practice: the role and function of facilitation. J Adv Nurs. 2002; 37(6):577-88. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02126.x. View

5.
Wiltsey Stirman S, Kimberly J, Cook N, Calloway A, Castro F, Charns M . The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement Sci. 2012; 7:17. PMC: 3317864. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17. View