» Articles » PMID: 36644494

Evaluation of Iodinated Contrast Media Use in Abdominal CT Scans in Cancer Assessments: A Cross-Sectional Study in Lomé (Togo)

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Jan 16
PMID 36644494
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is great variability between centers regarding contrast injection protocols. They should only be injected if they can provide useful information for diagnosis with the necessary and sufficient quantity of iodine. We wanted to know through this study if the use of iodinated contrast media is optimised in abdominal CT scans performed for cancer assessment in Lomé.

Materials And Methods: It was a cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study with a prospective collection over a period of 6 months in three CT units in Lomé. It involved abdominal CT scans performed for oncological evaluation. Data were reported as the mean ± standard deviation. The Pearson correlation coefficient, ANOVA, chi-square, and the Fisher test were used.

Results: A total of 218 examinations were recorded. The female sex represented 56.88% of the patients. The mean age was 50.92 ± 15.78 years. The mean weight was 70.46 ± 15.23 kg. The mean BMI was 24.91 ± 5.32 kg/m. The examinations were performed with a voltage of 120 kV in 195 cases (89.45%). The mean dose of injected iodine was 0.42 ± 0.09 gI/kg with a dose of 0.40 gI/kg at 80 kV and 0.45 gI/kg at 130 kV. The mean injection rate was 2.90 ± 0.34 mL/s. The mean injected volume was 83.19 ± 7.29 mL. The mean duration of the injection was 30.60 ± 7.39 s. The mean iodine delivery rate was 0.98 ± 0.17 gI/s. There was no saline injection in 152 cases (69.72%). Liver contrast enhancement was satisfactory in 94.5% of cases. There was a strong negative linear correlation between the dose of injected iodine and weight.

Conclusions: Optimization guidelines for the use of iodinated contrast media are not always applied. Therefore, monitoring and benchmarking programmes for iodinated contrast injection protocols that involve all radiology personnel should be implemented.

References
1.
Zanardo M, Doniselli F, Esseridou A, Tritella S, Mattiuz C, Menicagli L . Abdominal CT: a radiologist-driven adjustment of the dose of iodinated contrast agent approaches a calculation per lean body weight. Eur Radiol Exp. 2018; 2(1):41. PMC: 6279751. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-018-0074-1. View

2.
Zhu X, Zhu Y, Xu H, Yang G, Tang L, Xu Y . Dual-source CT coronary angiography involving injection protocol with iodine load tailored to patient body weight and body mass index: estimation of optimal contrast material dose. Acta Radiol. 2012; 54(2):149-55. DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.120362. View

3.
Effi A, Koffi K, Aman N, Doukoure B, Ndah K, Koffi K . [Descriptive epidemiology of cancers in Cote d'Ivoire]. Bull Cancer. 2013; 100(2):119-25. DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2013.1695. View

4.
Chambers T, BARON R, Lush R . Hepatic CT enhancement. Part I. Alterations in the volume of contrast material within the same patients. Radiology. 1994; 193(2):513-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.193.2.7972770. View

5.
Davenport M, Parikh K, Mayo-Smith W, Israel G, Brown R, Ellis J . Effect of Fixed-Volume and Weight-Based Dosing Regimens on the Cost and Volume of Administered Iodinated Contrast Material at Abdominal CT. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016; 14(3):359-370. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.001. View