» Articles » PMID: 20032149

Low-tube-voltage, High-tube-current Multidetector Abdominal CT: Improved Image Quality and Decreased Radiation Dose with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm--initial Clinical Experience

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2009 Dec 25
PMID 20032149
Citations 171
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) algorithm improves the image quality at low-tube-voltage (80-kVp), high-tube-current (675-mA) multidetector abdominal computed tomography (CT) during the late hepatic arterial phase.

Materials And Methods: This prospective, single-center HIPAA-compliant study was institutional review board approved. Informed patient consent was obtained. Ten patients (six men, four women; mean age, 63 years; age range, 51-77 years) known or suspected to have hypervascular liver tumors underwent dual-energy 64-section multidetector CT. High- and low-tube-voltage CT images were acquired sequentially during the late hepatic arterial phase of contrast enhancement. Standard convolution FBP was used to reconstruct 140-kVp (protocol A) and 80-kVp (protocol B) image sets, and ASIR (protocol C) was used to reconstruct 80-kVp image sets. The mean image noise; contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) relative to muscle for the aorta, liver, and pancreas; and effective dose with each protocol were assessed. A figure of merit (FOM) was computed to normalize the image noise and CNR for each protocol to effective dose. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons was used to compare differences in mean CNR, image noise, and corresponding FOM among the three protocols. The noise power spectra generated from a custom phantom with each protocol were also compared.

Results: When image noise was normalized to effective dose, protocol C, as compared with protocols A (P = .0002) and B (P = .0001), yielded an approximately twofold reduction in noise. When the CNR was normalized to effective dose, protocol C yielded significantly higher CNRs for the aorta, liver, and pancreas than did protocol A (P = .0001 for all comparisons) and a significantly higher CNR for the liver than did protocol B (P = .003). Mean effective doses were 17.5 mSv +/- 0.6 (standard error) with protocol A and 5.1 mSv +/- 0.3 with protocols B and C. Compared with protocols A and B, protocol C yielded a small but quantifiable noise reduction across the entire spectrum of spatial frequencies.

Conclusion: Compared with standard FBP reconstruction, an ASIR algorithm improves image quality and has the potential to decrease radiation dose at low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT during the late hepatic arterial phase.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the effect of reducing metal artifacts in multi-detector CT imaging of zirconia and titanium implants.

Suito H, Yoshihara H, Maeda N, Kasai R, Inoue T, Amano M Oral Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40038165 DOI: 10.1007/s11282-025-00814-5.


Reduced-dose deep learning iterative reconstruction for abdominal computed tomography with low tube voltage and tube current.

Zhu S, Zhang B, Tian Q, Li A, Liu Z, Hou W BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):389.

PMID: 39696218 PMC: 11658360. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02811-w.


Optimizing computed tomography image reconstruction for focal hepatic lesions: Deep learning image reconstruction vs iterative reconstruction.

Jaruvongvanich V, Muangsomboon K, Teerasamit W, Suvannarerg V, Komoltri C, Thammakittiphan S Heliyon. 2024; 10(15):e34847.

PMID: 39170325 PMC: 11336302. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34847.


Evaluating Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Low-Dose Thoraco-Abdominal CT Angiography with a Tin Filter for Patients with Aortic Disease.

Oh C, Cho S, Kwon H J Clin Med. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 38398309 PMC: 10889810. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13040996.


Deep learning reconstruction CT for liver metastases: low-dose dual-energy vs standard-dose single-energy.

Lyu P, Li Z, Chen Y, Wang H, Liu N, Liu J Eur Radiol. 2023; 34(1):28-38.

PMID: 37532899 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10033-3.