» Articles » PMID: 36629714

Distortions of Parliamentary Amendments to the Equitable Allocation of Federal Resources to the PAB

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Jan 11
PMID 36629714
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Analyze the implications of parliamentary amendments (EP) for the model of equitable allocation of resources from the Fixed Primary Care Minimum (PAB-Fixo) to municipalities in the period from 2015 to 2019.

Methods: A descriptive and exploratory study was conducted on allocating federal resources to the PAB-Fixo and on the increment in the PAB by parliamentary amendment. The municipalities were classified into four groups according to degrees of socioeconomic vulnerability defined by the Ministry of Health for the allocation of PAB-Fixo resources. The transfers from the Ministry by parliamentary amendment were identified. The proportions of municipalities benefiting per group were analyzed by resources allocated from the PAB-Fixo and increment to the minimum by EP.

Results: There were reduced resources allocated to the PAB-Fixo (from R$ 6.04 billion to R$ 5.51 billion, -8.8%) and increased increment to PAB by parliamentary amendment (from R$ 95.06 million to R$ 5.58 billion, 5.767%) between 2015 and 2019. The participation of municipalities by the group of those favored by EP was similar to that in the PAB-Fixo. In the proportion of resources for amendments, the municipalities of group I (most vulnerable) had more participation, and those of group IV had less participation if compared to the allocation of the PAB-Fixo. The distribution of resources by the parliamentary amendment did not cover all municipalities, even the most vulnerable ones, i.e., belonging to groups I and II. There was great inequality of resources per capita according to the groups of municipalities.

Conclusion: The EP distorted the model of equitable allocation of resources proposed by the Ministry of Health for the PAB-Fixo, by allocating resources in a much more significant proportion to the municipalities of group I and much less to those of group IV, which is in disagreement with this model. Furthermore, this distribution by amendments does not benefit all municipalities, not even the most vulnerable.

Citing Articles

[Effects of parliamentary amendments on municipal financing of primary health care in the Brazilian Unified National Health System].

Ulinski K, Carvalho B, Vieira F, Rodrigues R, Dias de Lima L Cad Saude Publica. 2024; 40(3):e00007323.

PMID: 38656068 PMC: 11034628. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311XPT007323.

References
1.
Guindo L, Wagner M, Baltussen R, Rindress D, van Til J, Kind P . From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2012; 10(1):9. PMC: 3495194. DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-10-9. View

2.
Mendes A, Leite M, Carnut L . A methodology for apportioning federal SUS resources: the health needs index. Rev Saude Publica. 2020; 54:77. PMC: 7416632. DOI: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001661. View

3.
Porto S, Martins M, Travassos C, Viacava F . [Evaluation of a methodology for financial resources allocation in Brazilian health sector]. Cad Saude Publica. 2007; 23(6):1393-404. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2007000600014. View

4.
Baptista T, Machado C, Dias de Lima L, Garcia M, de Andrade C, Gerassi C . [Congressional amendments to the Brazilian Federal health budget]. Cad Saude Publica. 2013; 28(12):2267-79. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2012001400006. View

5.
Lane H, Sarkies M, Martin J, Haines T . Equity in healthcare resource allocation decision making: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2017; 175:11-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.012. View