From Efficacy to Equity: Literature Review of Decision Criteria for Resource Allocation and Healthcare Decisionmaking

Overview

Journal Cost Eff Resour Alloc

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2012 Jul 20

PMID 22808944

Citations 86

Authors

Lalla Aida Guindo

Monika Wagner

Rob Baltussen

Donna Rindress

Janine van Til

Paul Kind

Mireille M Goetghebeur

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Unlabelled:

Objectives: Resource allocation is a challenging issue faced by health policy decisionmakers requiring careful consideration of many factors. Objectives of this study were to identify decision criteria and their frequency reported in the literature on healthcare decisionmaking.

Method: An extensive literature search was performed in Medline and EMBASE to identify articles reporting healthcare decision criteria. Studies conducted with decisionmakers (e.g., focus groups, surveys, interviews), conceptual and review articles and articles describing multicriteria tools were included. Criteria were extracted, organized using a classification system derived from the EVIDEM framework and applying multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) principles, and the frequency of their occurrence was measured.

Results: Out of 3146 records identified, 2790 were excluded. Out of 356 articles assessed for eligibility, 40 studies included. Criteria were identified from studies performed in several regions of the world involving decisionmakers at micro, meso and macro levels of decision and from studies reporting on multicriteria tools. Large variations in terminology used to define criteria were observed and 360 different terms were identified. These were assigned to 58 criteria which were classified in 9 different categories including: health outcomes; types of benefit; disease impact; therapeutic context; economic impact; quality of evidence; implementation complexity; priority, fairness and ethics; and overall context. The most frequently mentioned criteria were: equity/fairness (32 times), efficacy/effectiveness (29), stakeholder interests and pressures (28), cost-effectiveness (23), strength of evidence (20), safety (19), mission and mandate of health system (19), organizational requirements and capacity (17), patient-reported outcomes (17) and need (16).

Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of considering both normative and feasibility criteria for fair allocation of resources and optimized decisionmaking for coverage and use of healthcare interventions. This analysis provides a foundation to develop a questionnaire for an international survey of decisionmakers on criteria and their relative importance. The ultimate objective is to develop sound multicriteria approaches to enlighten healthcare decisionmaking and priority-setting.

Citing Articles

An integrated framework to guide evidence-informed public health policymaking.

Haby M, Reveiz L, Thomas R, Jordan H J Public Health Policy. 2025; 46(1):193-210.

PMID: 39799247 PMC: 11893451. DOI: 10.1057/s41271-024-00535-9.

Achieving the state of Georgia 25% HIV incidence reduction target among men who have sex with men in Atlanta through expanded use of multimodal pre-exposure prophylaxis: A mathematical model.

Fraysse J, Anderson S, Smith J, Matthews D, Sarkar S, de Aragao F PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0312369.

PMID: 39787101 PMC: 11717278. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312369.

Facilitators and barriers to interprofessional collaboration among health professionals in primary healthcare centers in Qatar: a qualitative exploration using the "Gears" model.

El-Awaisi A, Yakti O, Elboshra A, Jasim K, AboAlward A, Shalfawi R BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):316.

PMID: 39192182 PMC: 11348528. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02537-8.

Evaluating the impact of the global evidence, local adaptation (GELA) project for enhancing evidence-informed guideline recommendations for newborn and young child health in three African countries: a mixed-methods protocol.

Kredo T, Effa E, Mbeye N, Mabetha D, Schmidt B, Rohwer A Health Res Policy Syst. 2024; 22(1):114.

PMID: 39160559 PMC: 11334341. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01189-5.

Precision public health, the key for future outbreak management: A scoping review.

Rajendran E, Hairi F, Krishna Supramaniam R, T Mohd T Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241256877.

PMID: 39139190 PMC: 11320687. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241256877.

References

Culyer A, Bombard Y . An equity framework for health technology assessments. Med Decis Making. 2011; 32(3):428-41. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11426484. View

Johnson A, Sikich N, Evans G, Evans W, Giacomini M, Glendining M . Health technology assessment: a comprehensive framework for evidence-based recommendations in Ontario. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009; 25(2):141-50. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462309090199. View

Baltussen R, Niessen L . Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2006; 4:14. PMC: 1560167. DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-4-14. View

Baltussen R, Stolk E, Chisholm D, Aikins M . Towards a multi-criteria approach for priority setting: an application to Ghana. Health Econ. 2006; 15(7):689-96. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1092. View

Gibson J, Martin D, Singer P . Evidence, economics and ethics: resource allocation in health services organizations. Healthc Q. 2005; 8(2):50-9, 4. DOI: 10.12927/hcq..17099. View

Burls A, Caron L, Cleret de Langavant G, Dondorp W, Harstall C, Pathak-Sen E . Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: a proposed framework. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011; 27(3):230-7. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462311000250. View

Goetghebeur M, Wagner M, Khoury H, Rindress D, Gregoire J, Deal C . Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2010; 8:4. PMC: 2856527. DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-8-4. View

Bowen S, Zwi A . Pathways to "evidence-informed" policy and practice: a framework for action. PLoS Med. 2005; 2(7):e166. PMC: 1140676. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020166. View

Dolan J . Multi-criteria clinical decision support: A primer on the use of multiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare. Patient. 2011; 3(4):229-248. PMC: 3049911. DOI: 10.2165/11539470-000000000-00000. View

10.

Tannahill A . Beyond evidence--to ethics: a decision-making framework for health promotion, public health and health improvement. Health Promot Int. 2008; 23(4):380-90. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dan032. View

11.

Lehoux P, Williams-Jones B . Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007; 23(1):9-16. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462307051513. View

12.

Hofmann B . Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005; 21(3):312-8. DOI: 10.1017/s0266462305050415. View

13.

Lasry A, Carter M, Zaric G . Allocating funds for HIV/AIDS: a descriptive study of KwaDukuza, South Africa. Health Policy Plan. 2010; 26(1):33-42. PMC: 3119385. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czq022. View

14.

Asante A, Zwi A . Factors influencing resource allocation decisions and equity in the health system of Ghana. Public Health. 2009; 123(5):371-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.02.006. View

15.

Wilson E, Sussex J, MacLeod C, Fordham R . Prioritizing health technologies in a Primary Care Trust. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007; 12(2):80-5. DOI: 10.1258/135581907780279495. View

16.

Chalkidou K, Tunis S, Lopert R, Rochaix L, Sawicki P, Nasser M . Comparative effectiveness research and evidence-based health policy: experience from four countries. Milbank Q. 2009; 87(2):339-67. PMC: 2881450. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00560.x. View

17.

Nord E, Daniels N, Kamlet M . QALYs: some challenges. Value Health. 2009; 12 Suppl 1:S10-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00516.x. View

18.

Vuorenkoski L, Toiviainen H, Hemminki E . Decision-making in priority setting for medicines--a review of empirical studies. Health Policy. 2007; 86(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.09.007. View

19.

Luce B, Drummond M, Jonsson B, Neumann P, Schwartz J, Siebert U . EBM, HTA, and CER: clearing the confusion. Milbank Q. 2010; 88(2):256-76. PMC: 2980346. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00598.x. View

20.

Andreae M, Lamarand K, Abraham L, Freed G . Basis for immunization recommendations among countries of the worldHealth Organization European region. Hum Vaccin. 2009; 5(11):754-60. DOI: 10.4161/hv.5.11.9829. View