» Articles » PMID: 36621036

The SUMMIT Study: Utilising a Written 'Next Steps' Information Booklet to Prepare Participants for Potential Lung Cancer Screening Results and Follow-up

Abstract

Objectives: Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer can result in several potential outcomes of varying significance. Communication methods used in Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) programmes must, therefore, ensure that participants are prepared for the range of possible results and follow-up. Here, we assess perceptions of a written preparatory information booklet provided to participants in a large LCS cohort designed to convey this information.

Materials And Methods: All participants in the SUMMIT Study (NCT03934866) were provided with a results preparation information booklet, entitled 'The SUMMIT Study: Next Steps' at their baseline appointment which outlined potential results, their significance, and timelines for follow up. Results from the LDCT scan and Lung Health Check were subsequently sent by letter. Perceptions of this booklet were assessed among participants with indeterminate pulmonary findings when they attended a face-to-face appointment immediately before their three-month interval scan. Specifically, questions assessed the perceived usefulness of the booklet and the amount of information contained in it.

Results: 70.1% (n = 1,412/2,014) participants remembered receiving the booklet at their appointment. Of these participants, 72.0% (n = 1,017/1,412) found it quite or very useful and 68.0% (n = 960/1,412) reported that it contained the right amount of information. Older participants, those from the least deprived socioeconomic quintile and those of Black ethnicity were less likely to report finding the booklet either quite or very useful, or that it contained the right amount of information. Participants who remembered receiving the booklet were more likely to be satisfied with the process of results communication by letter.

Conclusion: Providing written information that prepares participants for possible LDCT results and their significance appears to be a useful resource and a helpful adjunct to a written method of results communication for large scale LCS programmes.

Citing Articles

Cancer Screening: Present Recommendations, the Development of Multi-Cancer Early Development Tests, and the Prospect of Universal Cancer Screening.

Gales L, Paun M, Anghel R, Trifanescu O Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(6).

PMID: 38539525 PMC: 10969110. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16061191.

References
1.
Dickson J, Hall H, Horst C, Tisi S, Verghese P, Mullin A . Telephone risk-based eligibility assessment for low-dose CT lung cancer screening. Thorax. 2022; 77(10):1036-1040. PMC: 9510431. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218634. View

2.
Dickson J, Bhamani A, Quaife S, Horst C, Tisi S, Hall H . The reporting of pulmonary nodule results by letter in a lung cancer screening setting. Lung Cancer. 2022; 168:46-49. PMC: 10442288. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.04.009. View

3.
Smith J, Scammon D, Beck S . Using patient focus groups for new patient services. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995; 21(1):22-31. DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30124-9. View

4.
Wilson E, Park D, Curtis L, Cameron K, Clayman M, Makoul G . Media and memory: the efficacy of video and print materials for promoting patient education about asthma. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 80(3):393-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.011. View

5.
Field J, Duffy S, Baldwin D, Whynes D, Devaraj A, Brain K . UK Lung Cancer RCT Pilot Screening Trial: baseline findings from the screening arm provide evidence for the potential implementation of lung cancer screening. Thorax. 2015; 71(2):161-70. PMC: 4752629. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207140. View