» Articles » PMID: 31807316

Combining Qualitative Research with PPI: Reflections on Using the Person-based Approach for Developing Behavioural Interventions

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Dec 7
PMID 31807316
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The value and importance of qualitative research and Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) for developing complex health interventions is widely recognised. However, there is often confusion between the two, with researchers relying on just one of these approaches, rather than using the two alongside one another.

Methods: The Person-Based Approach (PBA) to developing health-related behaviour change interventions adapts and integrates methods from user-centred design and qualitative research. The PBA involves qualitative research at multiple stages of interventions to ensure they are acceptable, feasible, meaningful, and optimally engaging to the people who will use them. The qualitative research is carried out with research participants from a target population, who have no prior or continuing involvement in the wider research process and see the intervention from a fresh perspective. This enables in-depth understanding of the views and experiences of a wide range of target users and the contexts within which they engage with behavioural change.PPI in research is carried out or members of the public and is a key part of the research process. PPI contributors are involved at all stages of research design and interpretation. PPI provides input into interventions as members of the research team alongside other stakeholders, such as health professionals and behaviour change experts.

Results: We advocate using qualitative research alongside PPI at all stages of intervention planning, development, and evaluation. We illustrate this with examples from recent projects developing complex health interventions, highlighting examples where PPI and PBA have pulled in different directions and how we have approached this, how PPI have helped optimise interventions based on PBA feedback, and how we have engaged PPI in community settings.

Conclusions: PPI provides a valuable alternative to the traditional researcher-led approaches, which can be poorly matched to the needs of target users. Combining PPI with the PBA can help to create optimally engaging interventions by incorporating a greater diversity of feedback than would have been possible to achieve through PPI or qualitative approaches alone.

Citing Articles

Developing a Smart Sensing Sock to Prevent Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Qualitative Focus Group and Interview Study.

Corser J, Yoldi I, Reeves N, Culmer P, Venkatraman P, Orlando G J Particip Med. 2025; 17:e59608.

PMID: 39951698 PMC: 11888051. DOI: 10.2196/59608.


The person-based approach to intervention development: A scoping review of methods and applications.

Holt L, Denford S, Bowers H, Kuberka P, Muller I, Amlot R Digit Health. 2025; 11():20552076241305934.

PMID: 39801581 PMC: 11719439. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241305934.


Adapting and testing an eLearning resource for professionals to support families when a significant caregiver for children is dying with cancer.

ONeill C, Hanna J, Sheehan S, McCance T, Drury A, Semple C BMC Palliat Care. 2024; 23(1):268.

PMID: 39574104 PMC: 11580503. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01601-5.


"The only way that they can access help quickly": a qualitative exploration of key stakeholders' perspectives on guided self-help interventions for children and young people with eating disorders.

Davey E, Micali N, Bryant-Waugh R, Bennett S, Lau C, Shafran R J Eat Disord. 2024; 12(1):149.

PMID: 39350141 PMC: 11441004. DOI: 10.1186/s40337-024-01113-w.


Evaluating qualitative data analysis workshops from the perspective of public contributors.

Moult A, McGrath C, Lippiett K, Coope C, Turner A, Chillcott S Res Involv Engagem. 2024; 10(1):99.

PMID: 39334502 PMC: 11429467. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00628-5.


References
1.
Domecq J, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N . Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:89. PMC: 3938901. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89. View

2.
Pandya-Wood R, Barron D, Elliott J . A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: time to develop ethically conscious standards. Res Involv Engagem. 2017; 3:6. PMC: 5611655. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-017-0058-y. View

3.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1655. PMC: 2769032. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1655. View

4.
Smith E, Bradbury K, Scott L, Steele M, Little P, Yardley L . Providing online weight management in Primary Care: a mixed methods process evaluation of healthcare practitioners' experiences of using and supporting patients using POWeR. Implement Sci. 2017; 12(1):69. PMC: 5445406. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0596-6. View

5.
Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W . Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015; 350:h1258. PMC: 4366184. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. View