» Articles » PMID: 36612884

Innovative Methods Used in Monitoring COVID-19 in Europe: A Multinational Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Jan 8
PMID 36612884
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several innovative methods have been deployed worldwide to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the study is to investigate which innovative methods are used to monitor COVID-19 health issues in Europe and related legislative and ethical aspects. An online questionnaire was administered to European countries' representatives of the project Population Health Information Research Infrastructure. Additional information was obtained from websites and documents provided by the respondents; an overview of the literature was also performed. Respondents from 14 countries participated in the study. Digital tools are used to monitor the spread of COVID-19 (13/14 countries) and vaccination coverage (12/14); for research, diagnostics, telehealth (14/14); to fight disinformation (11/14) and forecast the pandemic spread (4/14). The level of implementation of telehealth applications was mostly low/medium. Legislative and ethical issues were encountered in many countries, leading to institutional distrust. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for timely and accurate health data for research purposes and policy planning. However, the use of innovative methods for population health monitoring and timely data collection has posed challenges to privacy and online security globally. Adequate regulatory oversight, targeted public health interventions, and fight against disinformation could improve the uptake rate and enhance countries' emergency preparedness.

Citing Articles

Ethical Considerations in Infodemic Management: Systematic Scoping Review.

Germani F, Spitale G, Machiri S, Ho C, Ballalai I, Biller-Andorno N JMIR Infodemiology. 2024; 4:e56307.

PMID: 39208420 PMC: 11393515. DOI: 10.2196/56307.


The role of digital tools and emerging devices in COVID-19 contact tracing during the first 18 months of the pandemic: a systematic review.

Unim B, Zile-Velika I, Pavlovska Z, Lapao L, Peyroteo M, Misins J Eur J Public Health. 2024; 34(Supplement_1):i11-i28.

PMID: 38946444 PMC: 11215323. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae039.


Analysis of the Effectiveness of Public Health Measures on COVID-19 Transmission.

Silva T, Anghinoni L, Chagas C, Zhao L, Tabak B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(18).

PMID: 37754616 PMC: 10531329. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20186758.

References
1.
Kletecka-Pulker M, Volkl-Kernstock S, Fassl A, Klager E, Willschke H, Klomfar S . Telehealth in Times of COVID-19: Spotlight on Austria. Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(3). PMC: 8001477. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9030280. View

2.
Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M . Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018; 24(1):4-12. PMC: 5768250. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X16674087. View

3.
Rosano A, Lorini C, Unim B, Griebler R, Cadeddu C, Regazzi L . Coronavirus-Related Health Literacy: A Cross-Sectional Study during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(7). PMC: 8998061. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19073807. View

4.
Tuckson R, Edmunds M, Hodgkins M . Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(16):1585-1592. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsr1503323. View

5.
Thissen M, Seeling S, Achterberg P, Fehr A, Palmieri L, Tijhuis M . Overview of national health reporting in the EU and quality criteria for public health reports - results of the Joint Action InfAct. Arch Public Health. 2021; 79(1):229. PMC: 8692080. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-021-00753-7. View