» Articles » PMID: 33558332

Implementation of Remote Consulting in UK Primary Care Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Mixed-methods Longitudinal Study

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Feb 9
PMID 33558332
Citations 210
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To reduce contagion of COVID-19, in March 2020 UK general practices implemented predominantly remote consulting via telephone, video, or online consultation platforms.

Aim: To investigate the rapid implementation of remote consulting and explore impact over the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design And Setting: Mixed-methods study in 21 general practices in Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire.

Method: Longitudinal observational quantitative analysis compared volume and type of consultation in April to July 2020 with April to July 2019. Negative binomial models were used to identify if changes differed among different groups of patients. Qualitative data from 87 longitudinal interviews with practice staff in four rounds investigated practices' experience of the move to remote consulting, challenges faced, and solutions. A thematic analysis utilised Normalisation Process Theory.

Results: There was universal consensus that remote consulting was necessary. This drove a rapid change to 90% remote GP consulting (46% for nurses) by April 2020. Consultation rates reduced in April to July 2020 compared to 2019; GPs and nurses maintained a focus on older patients, shielding patients, and patients with poor mental health. Telephone consulting was sufficient for many patient problems, video consulting was used more rarely, and was less essential as lockdown eased. SMS-messaging increased more than three-fold. GPs were concerned about increased clinical risk and some had difficulties setting thresholds for seeing patients face-to-face as lockdown eased.

Conclusion: The shift to remote consulting was successful and a focus maintained on vulnerable patients. It was driven by the imperative to reduce contagion and may have risks; post-pandemic, the model will need adjustment.

Citing Articles

Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.

Agarwal P, Fletcher G, Ramamoorthi K, Yao X, Bhattacharyya O J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e55007.

PMID: 39951717 PMC: 11888022. DOI: 10.2196/55007.


Enhancing access to primary care is critical to the future of an equitable health service: using process visualisation to understand the impact of national policy in the UK.

Litchfield I, Gale N, Greenfield S, Shukla D, Burrows M Front Health Serv. 2025; 4:1499847.

PMID: 39931455 PMC: 11807964. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1499847.


A theory-based analysis of the implementation of online asynchronous telemedicine platforms into primary care practices using Normalisation Process Theory.

Leighton C, Joseph-Williams N, Porter A, Edwards A, Cooper A BMC Prim Care. 2025; 26(1):27.

PMID: 39915751 PMC: 11800456. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02717-0.


Ten pressure points in primary care during COVID-19: findings from an international narrative review.

Dykgraaf S, Parkinson A, Wright M, Wong W, Desborough J, Ball L BMC Prim Care. 2025; 26(1):19.

PMID: 39856560 PMC: 11759439. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02640-w.


Trends in general practitioner consultations for hand foot and mouth disease in England between 2017 and 2022.

Bednarska N, Smith S, Bardsley M, Loveridge P, Byford R, Elson W Epidemiol Infect. 2025; 153:e22.

PMID: 39801026 PMC: 11795447. DOI: 10.1017/S095026882400181X.


References
1.
Sholle E, Pinheiro L, Adekkanattu P, Davila M, Johnson S, Pathak J . Underserved populations with missing race ethnicity data differ significantly from those with structured race/ethnicity documentation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019; 26(8-9):722-729. PMC: 6696506. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz040. View

2.
Banks J, Farr M, Salisbury C, Bernard E, Northstone K, Edwards H . Use of an electronic consultation system in primary care: a qualitative interview study. Br J Gen Pract. 2017; 68(666):e1-e8. PMC: 5737315. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X693509. View

3.
Hammersley V, Donaghy E, Parker R, McNeilly H, Atherton H, Bikker A . Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2019; 69(686):e595-e604. PMC: 6607843. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X704573. View

4.
Farr M, Banks J, Edwards H, Northstone K, Bernard E, Salisbury C . Implementing online consultations in primary care: a mixed-method evaluation extending normalisation process theory through service co-production. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(3):e019966. PMC: 5875620. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019966. View

5.
Salisbury C, Murphy M, Duncan P . The Impact of Digital-First Consultations on Workload in General Practice: Modeling Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(6):e18203. PMC: 7327596. DOI: 10.2196/18203. View