» Articles » PMID: 36575417

Comparison of CT Values in Traditional Trajectory, Traditional Cortical Bone Trajectory, and Modified Cortical Bone Trajectory

Overview
Journal BMC Surg
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 Dec 27
PMID 36575417
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To compare the CT values and length of the screw tracks of traditional trajectory (TT), cortical bone trajectory (CBT), and modified cortical bone trajectory (MCBT) screws and investigate the effects on the biomechanics of lumbar fixation.

Methods: CT scan data of 60 L4 and L5 lumbar spine were retrieved and divided into 4 groups (10 male and 10 female cases in the 20-30 years old group and 20 male and 20 female cases in the 30-40 years old group). 3-dimentional (3D) model were established using Mimics 19.0 for each group and the placement of three techniques was simulated on the L4 and L5, and the part of the bone occupied by the screw track was set as the region of interest (ROI). The mean CT value and the actual length of the screw track were measured by Mimics 19.0.

Results: The CT values of ROI for the three techniques were significantly different between the same gander in each age group (P < 0.05). The difference of screw track lengths for CBT and MCBT in the male and female is significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: According to the CT values of the three screw tracks: MCBT > CBT > TT, the MCBT screw track has greater bone-screw surface strength and longer screw tracks than CBT, which is easier to reach the anterior column of the vertebral body contributing to superior biomechanical properties.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Different Regional Anesthesia Techniques on the Incidence of Chronic Post-surgical Pain in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis.

Zhao Y, Guo Y, Pan X, Zhang X, Yu F, Cao X Pain Ther. 2024; 13(6):1335-1350.

PMID: 39240480 PMC: 11543955. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00648-9.


The influence of osteoporosis on mechanical complications in lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review.

Filley A, Baldwin A, Ben-Natan A, Hansen K, Arora A, Xiao A N Am Spine Soc J. 2024; 18:100327.

PMID: 38962714 PMC: 11219986. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100327.


Hybrid cortical bone trajectory and modified cortical bone trajectory techniques in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L4-L5 segment: A finite element analysis.

Wang Y, Maimaiti A, Xiao Y, Tuoheti A, Zhang R, Maitusong M Heliyon. 2024; 10(5):e26294.

PMID: 38434416 PMC: 10906328. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26294.

References
1.
Ueno M, Imura T, Inoue G, Takaso M . Posterior corrective fusion using a double-trajectory technique (cortical bone trajectory combined with traditional trajectory) for degenerative lumbar scoliosis with osteoporosis: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 19(5):600-7. DOI: 10.3171/2013.7.SPINE13191. View

2.
Varghese V, Krishnan V, Saravana Kumar G . Evaluating Pedicle-Screw Instrumentation Using Decision-Tree Analysis Based on Pullout Strength. Asian Spine J. 2018; 12(4):611-621. PMC: 6068417. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.611. View

3.
Kojima K, Asamoto S, Kobayashi Y, Ishikawa M, Fukui Y . Cortical bone trajectory and traditional trajectory--a radiological evaluation of screw-bone contact. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015; 157(7):1173-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-015-2432-6. View

4.
Okuyama K, Sato K, Abe E, Inaba H, Shimada Y, Murai H . Stability of transpedicle screwing for the osteoporotic spine. An in vitro study of the mechanical stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993; 18(15):2240-5. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199311000-00016. View

5.
Fujiwara S, Ohnishi Y, Iwatsuki K, Kishima H . Cortical bone trajectory fixation cause low compression force in anterior vertebral column. N Am Spine Soc J. 2022; 10:100113. PMC: 9005947. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100113. View