» Articles » PMID: 36567319

Breath-by-breath P0.1 Measured on Quasi-occlusion Via Hamilton C6 May Result in Underestimation of Respiratory Drive and Inspiratory Effort

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2022 Dec 25
PMID 36567319
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We aimed to identify the threshold for P0.1 in a breath-by-breath manner measured by the Hamilton C6 on quasi-occlusion for high respiratory drive and inspiratory effort. In this prospective observational study, we analyzed the relationships between airway P0.1 on quasi-occlusion and esophageal pressure (esophageal P0.1 and esophageal pressure swing). We also conducted a linear regression analysis and derived the threshold of airway P0.1 on quasi-occlusion for high respiratory drive and inspiratory effort. We found that airway P0.1 measured on quasi-occlusion had a strong positive correlation with esophageal P0.1 measured on quasi-occlusion and esophageal pressure swing, respectively. Additionally, the P0.1 threshold for high respiratory drive and inspiratory effort were calculated at approximately 1.0 cmHO from the regression equations. Our calculations suggest a lower threshold of airway P0.1 measured by the Hamilton C6 on quasi-occlusion than that which has been previously reported.

Citing Articles

The Paradox of Occlusion Pressure at 0.1 s (P) Measurement Without Airway Occlusion.

Iotti G, Negri M, Schranz C Respir Care. 2024; 69(4):524-525.

PMID: 38538013 PMC: 11108113. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.11813.


Estimation of inspiratory effort using airway occlusion maneuvers in ventilated children: a secondary analysis of an ongoing randomized trial testing a lung and diaphragm protective ventilation strategy.

Ito Y, Herrera M, Hotz J, Kyogoku M, Newth C, Bhalla A Crit Care. 2023; 27(1):466.

PMID: 38031116 PMC: 10685539. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04754-6.

References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Akoumianaki E, Maggiore S, Valenza F, Bellani G, Jubran A, Loring S . The application of esophageal pressure measurement in patients with respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014; 189(5):520-31. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201312-2193CI. View

3.
Alberti A, Gallo F, Fongaro A, Valenti S, Rossi A . P0.1 is a useful parameter in setting the level of pressure support ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 1995; 21(7):547-53. DOI: 10.1007/BF01700158. View

4.
Bakdash J, Marusich L . Repeated Measures Correlation. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:456. PMC: 5383908. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00456. View

5.
Beloncle F, Piquilloud L, Olivier P, Vuillermoz A, Yvin E, Mercat A . Accuracy of P0.1 measurements performed by ICU ventilators: a bench study. Ann Intensive Care. 2019; 9(1):104. PMC: 6744533. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-019-0576-x. View