» Articles » PMID: 36567265

Improving Sandwich Variance Estimation for Marginal Cox Analysis of Cluster Randomized Trials

Overview
Journal Biom J
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Dec 25
PMID 36567265
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) frequently recruit a small number of clusters, therefore necessitating the application of small-sample corrections for valid inference. A recent systematic review indicated that CRTs reporting right-censored, time-to-event outcomes are not uncommon and that the marginal Cox proportional hazards model is one of the common approaches used for primary analysis. While small-sample corrections have been studied under marginal models with continuous, binary, and count outcomes, no prior research has been devoted to the development and evaluation of bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators when clustered time-to-event outcomes are analyzed by the marginal Cox model. To improve current practice, we propose nine bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators for the analysis of CRTs using the marginal Cox model and report on a simulation study to evaluate their small-sample properties. Our results indicate that the optimal choice of bias-corrected sandwich variance estimator for CRTs with survival outcomes can depend on the variability of cluster sizes and can also slightly differ whether it is evaluated according to relative bias or type I error rate. Finally, we illustrate the new variance estimators in a real-world CRT where the conclusion about intervention effectiveness differs depending on the use of small-sample bias corrections. The proposed sandwich variance estimators are implemented in an R package CoxBcv.

Citing Articles

Quantifying the Impact of Co-Housing on Murine Aging Studies.

Luciano A, Churchill G bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39149237 PMC: 11326161. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.06.606373.


Methods for the estimation of direct and indirect vaccination effects by combining data from individual- and cluster-randomized trials.

Wang R, Cen M, Huang Y, Qian G, Dean N, Ellenberg S Stat Med. 2024; 43(8):1627-1639.

PMID: 38348581 PMC: 11671029. DOI: 10.1002/sim.10030.


Simulating time-to-event data subject to competing risks and clustering: A review and synthesis.

Meng C, Esserman D, Li F, Zhao Y, Blaha O, Lu W Stat Methods Med Res. 2022; 32(2):305-333.

PMID: 36412111 PMC: 11654122. DOI: 10.1177/09622802221136067.

References
1.
Ford W, Westgate P . Improved standard error estimator for maintaining the validity of inference in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters. Biom J. 2017; 59(3):478-495. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201600182. View

2.
Chen X, Li F . Finite-sample adjustments in variance estimators for clustered competing risks regression. Stat Med. 2022; 41(14):2645-2664. DOI: 10.1002/sim.9375. View

3.
Thompson J, Hemming K, Forbes A, Fielding K, Hayes R . Comparison of small-sample standard-error corrections for generalised estimating equations in stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with a binary outcome: A simulation study. Stat Methods Med Res. 2020; 30(2):425-439. PMC: 8008420. DOI: 10.1177/0962280220958735. View

4.
Caille A, Tavernier E, Taljaard M, Desmee S . Methodological review showed that time-to-event outcomes are often inadequately handled in cluster randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 134:125-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.004. View

5.
Preisser J, Young M, Zaccaro D, Wolfson M . An integrated population-averaged approach to the design, analysis and sample size determination of cluster-unit trials. Stat Med. 2003; 22(8):1235-54. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1379. View