» Articles » PMID: 33751620

Sample Size and Power Considerations for Cluster Randomized Trials with Count Outcomes Subject to Right Truncation

Overview
Journal Biom J
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Mar 22
PMID 33751620
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are widely used in epidemiological and public health studies assessing population-level effect of group-based interventions. One important application of CRTs is the control of vector-borne disease, such as malaria. However, a particular challenge for designing these trials is that the primary outcome involves counts of episodes that are subject to right truncation. While sample size formulas have been developed for CRTs with clustered counts, they are not directly applicable when the counts are right truncated. To address this limitation, we discuss two marginal modeling approaches for the analysis of CRTs with truncated counts and develop two corresponding closed-form sample size formulas to facilitate the design of such trials. The proposed sample size formulas allow investigators to explore the power under a large number of scenarios without computationally intensive simulations. The proposed formulas are validated in extensive simulations. We further explore the implication of right truncation on power and apply the proposed formulas to illustrate the power calculation for a malaria control CRT where the primary outcome is subject to right truncation.

Citing Articles

Designing individually randomized group treatment trials with repeated outcome measurements using generalized estimating equations.

Wang X, Turner E, Li F Stat Med. 2023; 43(2):358-378.

PMID: 38009329 PMC: 10939061. DOI: 10.1002/sim.9966.


Informative cluster size in cluster-randomised trials: A case study from the TRIGGER trial.

Kahan B, Li F, Blette B, Jairath V, Copas A, Harhay M Clin Trials. 2023; 20(6):661-669.

PMID: 37439089 PMC: 10638852. DOI: 10.1177/17407745231186094.


Leveraging baseline covariates to analyze small cluster-randomized trials with a rare binary outcome.

Zhu A, Mitra N, Hemming K, Harhay M, Li F Biom J. 2023; 66(1):e2200135.

PMID: 37035941 PMC: 10562517. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202200135.


Improving sandwich variance estimation for marginal Cox analysis of cluster randomized trials.

Wang X, Turner E, Li F Biom J. 2022; 65(3):e2200113.

PMID: 36567265 PMC: 10482495. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202200113.


Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials with time-to-event outcomes under the additive hazards mixed model.

Blaha O, Esserman D, Li F Stat Med. 2022; 41(24):4860-4885.

PMID: 35908796 PMC: 9588628. DOI: 10.1002/sim.9541.


References
1.
Gallis J, Li F, Turner E . xtgeebcv: A command for bias-corrected sandwich variance estimation for GEE analyses of cluster randomized trials. Stata J. 2022; 20(2):363-381. PMC: 8942127. DOI: 10.1177/1536867x20931001. View

2.
Murray D, Varnell S, Blitstein J . Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(3):423-32. PMC: 1448268. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.94.3.423. View

3.
Eldridge S, Ashby D, Kerry S . Sample size for cluster randomized trials: effect of coefficient of variation of cluster size and analysis method. Int J Epidemiol. 2006; 35(5):1292-300. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyl129. View

4.
Ivers N, Taljaard M, Dixon S, Bennett C, McRae A, Taleban J . Impact of CONSORT extension for cluster randomised trials on quality of reporting and study methodology: review of random sample of 300 trials, 2000-8. BMJ. 2011; 343:d5886. PMC: 3180203. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5886. View

5.
Fay M, Graubard B . Small-sample adjustments for Wald-type tests using sandwich estimators. Biometrics. 2002; 57(4):1198-206. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.01198.x. View