» Articles » PMID: 36559050

A Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Ruxolitinib and Posaconazole to Predict CYP3A4-Mediated Drug-Drug Interaction Frequently Observed in Graft Versus Host Disease Patients

Overview
Journal Pharmaceutics
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Dec 23
PMID 36559050
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD). It is predominantly metabolized via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. As patients with GvHD have an increased risk of invasive fungal infections, RUX is frequently combined with posaconazole (POS), a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Knowledge of RUX exposure under concomitant POS treatment is scarce and recommendations on dose modifications are inconsistent. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to investigate the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between POS and RUX. The predicted RUX exposure was compared to observed concentrations in patients with GvHD in the clinical routine. PBPK models for RUX and POS were independently set up using PK-Sim Version 11. Plasma concentration-time profiles were described successfully and all predicted area under the curve (AUC) values were within 2-fold of the observed values. The increase in RUX exposure was predicted with a DDI ratio of 1.21 (C) and 1.59 (AUC). Standard dosing in patients with GvHD led to higher RUX exposure than expected, suggesting further dose reduction if combined with POS. The developed model can serve as a starting point for further simulations of the implemented DDI and can be extended to further perpetrators of CYP-mediated PK-DDIs or disease-specific physiological changes.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole delayed-release tablets and injections in pediatric patients.

Wu J, Chen C, Luo C, Ning B, Liu Y, Li Z Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024; 68(12):e0111224.

PMID: 39503485 PMC: 11619399. DOI: 10.1128/aac.01112-24.


Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ruxolitinib: A Review.

Appeldoorn T, Munnink T, Morsink L, Lub-de Hooge M, Touw D Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023; 62(4):559-571.

PMID: 37000342 PMC: 10064968. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01225-7.

References
1.
Zeiser R, Blazar B . Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease - Biologic Process, Prevention, and Therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(22):2167-2179. PMC: 6034180. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1609337. View

2.
Gubbins P, Krishna G, Sansone-Parsons A, Penzak S, Dong L, Martinho M . Pharmacokinetics and safety of oral posaconazole in neutropenic stem cell transplant recipients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006; 50(6):1993-9. PMC: 1479147. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00157-06. View

3.
Isberner N, Kraus S, Grigoleit G, Aghai F, Kurlbaum M, Zimmermann S . Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice-a prospective single-center trial. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021; 88(6):973-983. PMC: 8536600. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-021-04351-w. View

4.
Luzon E, Blake K, Cole S, Nordmark A, Versantvoort C, Berglund E . Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in regulatory decision-making at the European Medicines Agency. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 102(1):98-105. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.539. View

5.
Shi J, Fraczkiewicz G, Williams W, Yeleswaram S . Predicting drug-drug interactions involving multiple mechanisms using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling: a case study with ruxolitinib. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 97(2):177-85. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.30. View