» Articles » PMID: 36553707

Integrated Physiological and Metabolomic Analyses Reveal the Differences in the Fruit Quality of the Blueberry Cultivated in Three Soilless Substrates

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Dec 23
PMID 36553707
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With improving living standards, traditional blueberry planting modes cannot meet commercial demands, and blueberry cultivation with soilless substrate has become a popular solution in the blueberry industry. In this study, different soilless substrate treatments were found to markedly influence fruit appearance and intrinsic quality. The fruit in the 50:50 peat/pine bark (/) (FPB) treatment group had the maximum single fruit weight, largest vertical diameter, and brightest color, as well as the highest 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) value, solid-acid ratio and anthocyanin content. The fruit in the 50:50 pine bark/rice husk (/) (FBR) treatment group had the highest total phenol and flavonoid levels, largest drip loss value, and lowest total pectin content and firmness value. Metabolomic analysis showed that flavonoid, carbohydrate, and carbohydrate conjugate, and amino acid, peptide, and analog levels were significantly different between groups. Fruit in the FPB group had the highest sucrose, D-fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, salidroside, tectorigenin, naringenin chalcone, trifolirhizin, and galangin contents. The increase in the relative expression of phenylalanine (Phe) promoted the synthesis of fruit polyphenols in the FBR group. Our results provide new insights into the effects of different substrates on the quality of blueberries and a reference for the soilless substrate cultivation of blueberries.

Citing Articles

A Model for Selecting Kiwifruit () Germplasm Resources with Excellent Fruit Quality.

Chen L, Liu Y, Gao H, Cao J, Qian J, Zheng K Foods. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39766957 PMC: 11727286. DOI: 10.3390/foods13244014.


Growth, physiological and N, P, K accumulation responses of Erythropalum scandens Bl. Seedlings under different substrates.

Ma D, Yi B, Teng W, Ali I, Shao J, Lin Y BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):972.

PMID: 39415146 PMC: 11481793. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05678-1.


Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Profiling Reveals the Variations in Carbohydrate Metabolism between Two Blueberry Cultivars.

Yang H, Wei Z, Wu Y, Zhang C, Lyu L, Wu W Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(1).

PMID: 38203463 PMC: 10778917. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25010293.


Optimizing Alternative Substrate for Tomato Production in Arid Zone: Lesson from Growth, Water Relations, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, and Photosynthesis.

Aydi S, Aydi S, Marsit A, El Abed N, Rahmani R, Bouajila J Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(7).

PMID: 37050083 PMC: 10096997. DOI: 10.3390/plants12071457.

References
1.
Li L, Sheen J . Dynamic and diverse sugar signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016; 33:116-125. PMC: 5050104. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.06.018. View

2.
Heischmann S, Quinn K, Cruickshank-Quinn C, Liang L, Reisdorph R, Reisdorph N . Exploratory Metabolomics Profiling in the Kainic Acid Rat Model Reveals Depletion of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 during Epileptogenesis. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:31424. PMC: 4985632. DOI: 10.1038/srep31424. View

3.
Koziol A, Cybulska J, Pieczywek P, Zdunek A . Changes of pectin nanostructure and cell wall stiffness induced in vitro by pectinase. Carbohydr Polym. 2017; 161:197-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.014. View

4.
Patel M, Maurer D, Feygenberg O, Ovadia A, Elad Y, Oren-Shamir M . Phenylalanine: A Promising Inducer of Fruit Resistance to Postharvest Pathogens. Foods. 2020; 9(5). PMC: 7278716. DOI: 10.3390/foods9050646. View

5.
Ainsworth E, Gillespie K . Estimation of total phenolic content and other oxidation substrates in plant tissues using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2(4):875-7. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2007.102. View