» Articles » PMID: 36551811

NLRP3-Inflammasome Inhibition with IZD334 Does Not Reduce Cardiac Damage in a Pig Model of Myocardial Infarction

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2022 Dec 23
PMID 36551811
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

NLRP3-inflammasome-mediated signaling is thought to significantly contribute to the extent of myocardial damage after myocardial infarction (MI). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the NLRP3-inflammasome inhibitor IZD334 on cardiac damage in a pig model of myocardial infarction. Prior to in vivo testing, in vitro, porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells and whole blood were treated with increasing dosages of IZD334, a novel NLRP3-inflammasome inhibitor, and were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP). After determination of the pharmacological profile in healthy pigs, thirty female Landrace pigs were subjected to 75 min of transluminal balloon occlusion of the LAD coronary artery and treated with placebo or IZD334 (1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg once daily) in a blinded randomized fashion. In vitro, NLRP3-inflammasome stimulation showed the pronounced release of interleukin (IL)-1β that was attenuated by IZD334 (p < 0.001). In vivo, no differences were observed between groups in serological markers of inflammation nor myocardial IL-1β expression. After 7 days, the ejection fraction did not differ between groups, as assessed with MRI (placebo: 45.1 ± 8.7%, 1 mg/kg: 49.9 ± 6.1%, 3 mg/kg: 42.7 ± 3.8%, 10 mg/kg: 44.9 ± 6.4%, p = 0.26). Infarct size as a percentage of the area at risk was not reduced (placebo: 73.1 ± 3.0%, 1 mg/kg: 75.5 ± 7.3%, 3 mg/kg: 80.3 ± 3.9%, 10 mg/kg: 78.2 ± 8.0%, p = 0.21). In this pig MI model, we did not observe attenuation of the inflammatory response after NLRP3-inflammasome inhibition in vivo. Consecutively, no difference was observed in IS and cardiac function, while in vitro inhibition successfully reduced IL-1β release from stimulated porcine blood cells.

Citing Articles

Nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 inflammasome: From action mechanism to therapeutic target in clinical trials.

Zhang C, Liu S, Sui Y, Yang M World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025; 17(2):100094.

PMID: 39958558 PMC: 11756006. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i2.100094.


Initial Despair and Current Hope of Identifying a Clinically Useful Treatment of Myocardial Reperfusion Injury: Insights Derived from Studies of Platelet P2Y Antagonists and Interference with Inflammation and NLRP3 Assembly.

Cohen M, Downey J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(10).

PMID: 38791515 PMC: 11122283. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25105477.


Pharmacological Cardioprotection against Ischemia Reperfusion Injury-The Search for a Clinical Effective Therapy.

Wang Q, Zuurbier C, Huhn R, Torregroza C, Hollmann M, Preckel B Cells. 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37408266 PMC: 10217104. DOI: 10.3390/cells12101432.

References
1.
Sandanger O, Ranheim T, Vinge L, Bliksoen M, Alfsnes K, Finsen A . The NLRP3 inflammasome is up-regulated in cardiac fibroblasts and mediates myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2013; 99(1):164-74. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvt091. View

2.
Liu J, Wang H, Li J . Inflammation and Inflammatory Cells in Myocardial Infarction and Reperfusion Injury: A Double-Edged Sword. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2016; 10:79-84. PMC: 4892199. DOI: 10.4137/CMC.S33164. View

3.
Narendran S, Pereira F, Ambati J . NLRP3 Inflammasome Inhibition: A Potential Therapeutic Strategy to Attenuate Postinfarction Adverse Cardiac Remodeling. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2021; 5(12):1225-1227. PMC: 7775956. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.11.004. View

4.
Marchetti C, Toldo S, Chojnacki J, Mezzaroma E, Liu K, Salloum F . Pharmacologic Inhibition of the NLRP3 Inflammasome Preserves Cardiac Function After Ischemic and Nonischemic Injury in the Mouse. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2015; 66(1):1-8. PMC: 4500673. DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000247. View

5.
Toldo S, Abbate A . The NLRP3 inflammasome in acute myocardial infarction. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017; 15(4):203-214. DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.161. View