Do Coping Responses Predict Better/poorer Mental Health in Portuguese Adults During Portugal's National Lockdown Associated with the COVID-19?

Overview

Journal Pers Individ Dif

Date 2022 Dec 21

PMID 36540054

Authors

Margarida Jarego

Filipa Pimenta

Jose Pais-Ribeiro

Rui M Costa

Ivone Patrao

Lina Coelho

Alexandra Ferreira-Valente

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed at assessing the mental health status of adults living in Portugal during the national lockdown of March 2020 to May 2020, how study participants coped with stress during the national lockdown, as well as the association between coping responses and mental health status.

Methods: 430 adults from the general population living in Portugal completed measures of mental health status and coping.

Results: Participants reported a mental health status in the normal range. Most commonly used coping responses were acceptance, planning and active coping. The use of instrumental and emotional support, self-blame, venting, denial, behavioural disengagement, and substance use were associated with poorer mental health. Active coping, positive reframing, acceptance, and humour were associated with better mental health. However, only positive reframing and humour significantly predicted better mental health, while only substance use predicted poorer mental health.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that there was not a significant negative impact of the Portuguese national lockdown in the adults living in Portugal. Findings supported positive reframing and humour as being adaptive coping responses in this context. These responses should be encouraged by healthcare professionals and targeted in the context of psychosocial intervention programs directed to most vulnerable populations.

Citing Articles

Identifying disparities in mental illness and well-being across no-risk, risk, and intersectional groups during the Covid-19 pandemic and the role of sociodemographics in mental health outcomes.

Fernandes C, Netos F, Neto F, Costa P Braz J Psychiatry. 2024; 46:e20233532.

PMID: 38696738 PMC: 11744262. DOI: 10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3532.

Psychometric Validation of the Portuguese Obsession with COVID-19 Scale (PT-OCS).

Pires M, Mourao S, Santos J Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38470674 PMC: 10931488. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12050563.

Loneliness and associated factors among older adults during COVID-19 lockdown in Spain.

Ortega E, Gonzalez R, Vicario-Molina I, Picos A, Orgaz Baz M J Appl Dev Psychol. 2023; 86:101547.

PMID: 37153355 PMC: 10126222. DOI: 10.1016/j.appdev.2023.101547.

Managing the unexpected: Bicultural identity integration during the COVID-19 emergency.

Shamloo S, Cocco V, Faccini M, Benet-Martinez V, Trifiletti E Int J Intercult Relat. 2023; 93:101781.

PMID: 36845221 PMC: 9943769. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101781.

Turning to Religion During COVID-19 (Part II): A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and Meta-regression of Studies on the Relationship between Religious Coping and Mental Health throughout COVID-19.

Pankowski D, Wytrychiewicz-Pankowska K J Relig Health. 2023; 62(1):544-584.

PMID: 36595190 PMC: 9808764. DOI: 10.1007/s10943-022-01720-4.

References

Dindo L, Lackner J . Effects of Different Coping Strategies on Physical and Mental Health of Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15(10):1500-1503. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.03.041. View

Matua G, Wal D . Living Under the Constant Threat of Ebola: A Phenomenological Study of Survivors and Family Caregivers During an Ebola Outbreak. J Nurs Res. 2015; 23(3):217-24. DOI: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000116. View

Sim K, Chan Y, Chong P, Chua H, Wen Soon S . Psychosocial and coping responses within the community health care setting towards a national outbreak of an infectious disease. J Psychosom Res. 2010; 68(2):195-202. PMC: 7094450. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.004. View

Atchison C, Bowman L, Vrinten C, Redd R, Pristera P, Eaton J . Early perceptions and behavioural responses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of UK adults. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(1):e043577. PMC: 7783373. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043577. View

Main A, Zhou Q, Ma Y, Luecken L, Liu X . Relations of SARS-related stressors and coping to Chinese college students' psychological adjustment during the 2003 Beijing SARS epidemic. J Couns Psychol. 2011; 58(3):410-23. DOI: 10.1037/a0023632. View

Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho C . Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(5). PMC: 7084952. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051729. View

Banerjee D, Rai M . Social isolation in Covid-19: The impact of loneliness. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020; 66(6):525-527. PMC: 7405628. DOI: 10.1177/0020764020922269. View

Brooks S, Webster R, Smith L, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N . The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020; 395(10227):912-920. PMC: 7158942. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. View

Umucu E, Lee B . Examining the impact of COVID-19 on stress and coping strategies in individuals with disabilities and chronic conditions. Rehabil Psychol. 2020; 65(3):193-198. DOI: 10.1037/rep0000328. View

10.

Nickell L, Crighton E, Tracy C, Al-Enazy H, Bolaji Y, Hanjrah S . Psychosocial effects of SARS on hospital staff: survey of a large tertiary care institution. CMAJ. 2004; 170(5):793-8. PMC: 343853. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1031077. View

11.

Sun J, Harris K, Vazire S . Is well-being associated with the quantity and quality of social interactions?. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019; 119(6):1478-1496. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000272. View

12.

Finkelstein-Fox L, Park C . Control-coping goodness-of-fit and chronic illness: a systematic review of the literature. Health Psychol Rev. 2018; 13(2):137-162. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1560229. View

13.

Carver C . You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997; 4(1):92-100. DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6. View

14.

Mazza C, Ricci E, Biondi S, Colasanti M, Ferracuti S, Napoli C . A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(9). PMC: 7246819. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093165. View

15.

Rumpf H, Meyer C, Hapke U, John U . Screening for mental health: validity of the MHI-5 using DSM-IV Axis I psychiatric disorders as gold standard. Psychiatry Res. 2002; 105(3):243-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1781(01)00329-8. View

16.

Anisman H, Matheson K . Stress, depression, and anhedonia: caveats concerning animal models. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005; 29(4-5):525-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.007. View

17.

Larson D, Sherrill K, Lyons J, Craigie Jr F, Thielman S, Greenwold M . Associations between dimensions of religious commitment and mental health reported in the American Journal of Psychiatry and Archives of General Psychiatry: 1978-1989. Am J Psychiatry. 1992; 149(4):557-9. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.149.4.557. View

18.

McCauley M, Minsky S, Viswanath K . The H1N1 pandemic: media frames, stigmatization and coping. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13:1116. PMC: 3907032. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1116. View

19.

Simms A, Fear N, Greenberg N . The impact of having inadequate safety equipment on mental health. Occup Med (Lond). 2020; 70(4):278-281. PMC: 7313819. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa101. View

20.

Duan L, Zhu G . Psychological interventions for people affected by the COVID-19 epidemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7(4):300-302. PMC: 7128328. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30073-0. View