» Articles » PMID: 36530167

Adaptation to High Rates of Chromosomal Instability and Aneuploidy Through Multiple Pathways in Budding Yeast

Overview
Journal EMBO J
Date 2022 Dec 19
PMID 36530167
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Both an increased frequency of chromosome missegregation (chromosomal instability, CIN) and the presence of an abnormal complement of chromosomes (aneuploidy) are hallmarks of cancer. To better understand how cells are able to adapt to high levels of chromosomal instability, we previously examined yeast cells that were deleted of the gene BIR1, a member of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC). We found bir1Δ cells quickly adapted by acquiring specific combinations of beneficial aneuploidies. In this study, we monitored these yeast strains for longer periods of time to determine how cells adapt to high levels of both CIN and aneuploidy in the long term. We identify suppressor mutations that mitigate the chromosome missegregation phenotype. The mutated proteins fall into four main categories: outer kinetochore subunits, the SCF ubiquitin ligase complex, the mitotic kinase Mps1, and the CPC itself. The identified suppressor mutations functioned by reducing chromosomal instability rather than alleviating the negative effects of aneuploidy. Following the accumulation of suppressor point mutations, the number of beneficial aneuploidies decreased. These experiments demonstrate a time line of adaptation to high rates of CIN.

Citing Articles

Aneuploidy of specific chromosomes is beneficial to cells lacking spindle checkpoint protein Bub3.

Gadgil P, Ballew O, Sullivan T, Lacefield S PLoS Genet. 2025; 21(2):e1011576.

PMID: 39903784 PMC: 11819610. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011576.


Reduction of chromosomal instability and inflammation is a common aspect of adaptation to aneuploidy.

Hintzen D, Schubert M, Soto M, Medema R, Raaijmakers J EMBO Rep. 2024; 25(11):5169-5193.

PMID: 39294502 PMC: 11549362. DOI: 10.1038/s44319-024-00252-0.


The two sides of chromosomal instability: drivers and brakes in cancer.

Hosea R, Hillary S, Naqvi S, Wu S, Kasim V Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024; 9(1):75.

PMID: 38553459 PMC: 10980778. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-01767-7.


Structural mechanism of outer kinetochore Dam1-Ndc80 complex assembly on microtubules.

Muir K, Batters C, Dendooven T, Yang J, Zhang Z, Burt A Science. 2023; 382(6675):1184-1190.

PMID: 38060647 PMC: 7615550. DOI: 10.1126/science.adj8736.


Permission to pass: on the role of p53 as a gatekeeper for aneuploidy.

Marques J, Kops G Chromosome Res. 2023; 31(4):31.

PMID: 37864038 PMC: 10589155. DOI: 10.1007/s10577-023-09741-9.


References
1.
Vanoosthuyse V, Prykhozhij S, Hardwick K . Shugoshin 2 regulates localization of the chromosomal passenger proteins in fission yeast mitosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2007; 18(5):1657-69. PMC: 1855032. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e06-10-0890. View

2.
Cahill D, Kinzler K, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C . Genetic instability and darwinian selection in tumours. Trends Cell Biol. 1999; 9(12):M57-60. View

3.
Kwon M, Godinho S, Chandhok N, Ganem N, Azioune A, Thery M . Mechanisms to suppress multipolar divisions in cancer cells with extra centrosomes. Genes Dev. 2008; 22(16):2189-203. PMC: 2518815. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1700908. View

4.
Ainsztein A, Mackay A, Earnshaw W . INCENP centromere and spindle targeting: identification of essential conserved motifs and involvement of heterochromatin protein HP1. J Cell Biol. 1998; 143(7):1763-74. PMC: 2175214. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.143.7.1763. View

5.
Pavani M, Bonaiuti P, Chiroli E, Gross F, Natali F, Macaluso F . Epistasis, aneuploidy, and functional mutations underlie evolution of resistance to induced microtubule depolymerization. EMBO J. 2021; 40(22):e108225. PMC: 8591535. DOI: 10.15252/embj.2021108225. View