» Articles » PMID: 36523709

Modern Anchorage Systems in Orthodontics

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2022 Dec 16
PMID 36523709
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anchorage has been a vital topic since the origin of orthodontics. In the orthodontic process, gentle, constant pressure is applied to the teeth that need to be moved against the other teeth, which serve as the anchoring unit. The anchoring teeth must be completely stable. The introduction of temporary anchorage devices to the orthodontic field has made it possible to overcome conventional anchorage and its limitations. Mini implants have widened the horizon of the orthodontic field. Skeletal anchorage has, to a large degree, replaced conventional anchorage in a situation where anchorage is considered either critical, insufficient, or likely to result in undesirable side effects such as vertical displacements generated by intermaxillary force systems. Over the last few years, anchorage control with mini-implants has acquired plenty of significance in the clinical management of orthodontic patients. The mode of anchorage facilitated by these implant systems has a unique characteristic owing to their temporary use, which results in a transient, albeit absolute anchorage. The foregoing properties, together with the recently achieved simple application of these screws, have increased their popularity, establishing them as a necessary treatment option in complex cases that would have otherwise been impossible to treat. This comprehensive review aims to present and discuss the historical view, clinical uses, benefits, and drawbacks of the mini-screw implants used to obtain a temporary anchorage for orthodontic applications. Topics to be discussed include classification, types and properties, types of screw, head, and thread, their clinical applications, sites, and placement method selection.

Citing Articles

Novel Subperiosteal Device Geometry and Investigation of Efficacy on Surrounding Bone Formation and Bone-Bonding Strength.

Kaisaka Y, Uezono M, Inoue M, Takakuda K, Moriyama K Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(11).

PMID: 39593782 PMC: 11592213. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11111122.


Root Resorption and Alveolar Bone Changes in the Maxillary Canine Retraction Using NiTi Closed-Coil Springs Versus Elastomeric Chains: A Split-Mouth Trial.

Le L, Ma H, Do T, Le K J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024; 14(4):339-348.

PMID: 39380927 PMC: 11458088. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_5_24.


Three-dimensional assessment of low-level laser therapy on orthodontic miniscrew displacement using CBCT: a retrospective study.

Elfouly D, Abdel-Haffiez S, El-Harouni N, Elzoheiry M, Marzouk E BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):998.

PMID: 39182096 PMC: 11344972. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04711-x.


Orthodontic System Modeled and Simulated with the Lingual Technique to Assess Tooth Forces.

Hazem A, Marasescu F, Tuculina M, Popescu A, Popa D, Mihai L Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38893697 PMC: 11172380. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111171.


The Effects of SC06 on Behavior and Brain Function in Broilers Infected by .

Chen S, Liu J, Luo S, Xing L, Li W, Gong L Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38891594 PMC: 11171150. DOI: 10.3390/ani14111547.


References
1.
Samuels R, Rudge S, Mair L . A clinical study of space closure with nickel-titanium closed coil springs and an elastic module. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114(1):73-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70241-0. View

2.
Costello B, Ruiz R, Petrone J, Sohn J . Temporary skeletal anchorage devices for orthodontics. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010; 22(1):91-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2009.10.011. View

3.
Creekmore T, Eklund M . The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1983; 17(4):266-9. View

4.
Bain C . Smoking and implant failure--benefits of a smoking cessation protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11(6):756-9. View

5.
Khlef H, Hajeer M, Ajaj M, Heshmeh O . Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes of Retraction with Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices in Comparison with Two-step Retraction with Conventional Anchorage in Patients with Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2019; 9(4):513-523. PMC: 6868609. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_661_18. View