» Articles » PMID: 17276855

Comparison of 2 Distalization Systems Supported by Intraosseous Screws

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2007 Feb 6
PMID 17276855
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 2 distalization systems supported by intraosseous screws for maxillary molar distalization.

Methods: Forty subjects with skeletal Class I dental Class II malocclusion were divided into group 1 (8 girls, 12 boys) and group 2 (11 girls, 9 boys). An anchorage unit was prepared by placing an intraosseous screw in the premaxillary area of each subject. To increase the anchorage in group 2, we used an acrylic plate resembling the Nance button around the screw. The screws were placed and immediately loaded to distalize the maxillary first molars or second molars when they were present. Skeletal and dental changes were measured on cephalograms, and dental casts were obtained before and after distalization.

Results: The average distalization times were 4.6 months for group 1 and 5.4 months for group 2. On the cephalograms, the maxillary first molars were tipped 9.05 degrees in group 1 and 0.75 degrees in group 2. The mean distal movements were 3.95 mm in group 1 and 3.88 mm in group 2. On the dental casts, the mean distalization amounts were 4.85 mm for group 1 and 3.70 mm for group 2. In group 1, the maxillary molars were rotated distopalatally to a moderate degree, but this was not significant in group 2. Mild protrusion of the maxillary central incisors was also recorded for group 1 but not for group 2. However, there were no changes in overjet, overbite, and mandibular plane angle measurements for either group.

Conclusions: Immediately loaded intraosseous screw-supported anchorage units were successful for molar distalization in both groups. In group 2, side effects such as molar tipping and rotation were smaller, but distalization times were longer and hygiene was poorer.

Citing Articles

Treatment effects of modified miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expander and rapid palatal expander for molar distalization.

Park J, Choi T, Jang M, Kim S, Lee N Angle Orthod. 2025; 95(2):157-165.

PMID: 39799973 PMC: 11842109. DOI: 10.2319/042024-308.1.


Quality of occlusal outcome in adult class II patients after maxillary total arch distalization with interradicular mini-screws.

Janssens Y, Foley P, Beyling F, Schwestka-Polly R, Schmid J Head Face Med. 2024; 20(1):27.

PMID: 38671525 PMC: 11046796. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-024-00425-1.


Comparison of the Bone-Anchored Pendulum Appliance and the Bone-Anchored Intraoral Bodily Molar Distalizer: An Original Research.

Patowary J, Kumar P, Priya C, Kanwal B, Kauser A, Chacko P J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023; 15(Suppl 1):S166-S170.

PMID: 37654272 PMC: 10466626. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_446_22.


Three-dimensional changes after maxillary molar distalization with a miniscrew-anchored cantilever.

Vilanova L, Castillo A, Bellini-Pereira S, Henriques J, Janson G, Garib D Angle Orthod. 2023; 93(5):513-523.

PMID: 37079798 PMC: 10575634. DOI: 10.2319/091222-640.1.


Temporary anchorage devices and the forces and effects on the dentition and surrounding structures during orthodontic treatment: a scoping review.

Ritchie C, McGregor S, Bearn D Eur J Orthod. 2023; 45(3):324-337.

PMID: 36763546 PMC: 10230247. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjac072.