» Articles » PMID: 36522686

Posterior-stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics and Joint Laxity: A Hybrid Biomechanical Study

Overview
Journal Arthroplasty
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Dec 15
PMID 36522686
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Posterior-stabilized (PS)-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) arose as an alternative to cruciate-retaining (CR)-TKA in the 1970s. Since then, it has become a popularly utilized TKA design with outcomes comparable to CR-TKA. The post-cam mechanism is unique to PS-TKA as it substitutes the function of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). The study aimed to understand the kinematic and laxity changes in PS-TKA with under- and overstuffing of the tibiofemoral joint space with the polyethylene (PE) insert.

Methods: This study employed a hybrid computational-experimental joint motion simulation on a VIVO 6 degrees of freedom (6-DoF) joint motion simulator (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA). Physical prototypes of a virtually-performed TKA in mechanical alignment (MA) and kinematic alignment (KA) based on cadaveric CT scans and a virtual ligament model were utilized. The reference, understuffed (down 2 mm) and overstuffed (up 2 mm) joint spaces were simulated, neutral flexion and laxity testing loads and motions were performed for each configuration.

Results: The PE insert thickness influenced post-cam engagement, which occurred after 60º in the overstuffed configurations, after 60º-75º in the reference configurations and after 75º in the understuffed configurations. The understuffed configurations, compared to the reference configurations, resulted in a mean 2.0º (28%) and 2.0º (31%) increase in the coronal laxity in MA and KA respectively. The overstuffed configurations, compared to the reference configuration, resulted in an increase in the mean joint compressive forces (JCFs) by 73 N (61%) and 77 N (62%) in MA and KA models, respectively.

Conclusions: The under- and overstuffing in PS-TKA alter the kinematics with variable effects. Understuffing decreases the stability, JCFs and inverse with overstuffing. Subtle changes in the PE insert thickness alter the post-cam mechanics.

Citing Articles

Muscle-Driven Total Knee Replacement Stability with Virtual Ligaments.

Galley A, Donnelly E, Borukhov I, Lanting B, Willing R Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40001632 PMC: 11851665. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020112.


EMMATKA trial: the effects of mobilization with movement following total knee arthroplasty in women: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

Alsiri N, Alshatti S, Al-Saffar M, Bhatia R, Fairouz F, Palmer S J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):181.

PMID: 39979944 PMC: 11841275. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05568-8.


Modeling of the native knee with kinematic data derived from experiments using the VIVO™ joint simulator: a feasibility study.

Henke P, Meier J, Ruehrmund L, Brendle S, Krueger S, Grupp T Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):85.

PMID: 39180061 PMC: 11342559. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01279-z.


Impact of Structural Compliance of a Six Degree of Freedom Joint Simulator on Virtual Ligament Force Calculation in Total Knee Endoprosthesis Testing.

Kleist E, Henke P, Ruehrmund L, Kebbach M, Bader R, Woernle C Life (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38672801 PMC: 11050787. DOI: 10.3390/life14040531.


Exploration of the Advanced VIVO Joint Simulator: An In-Depth Analysis of Opportunities and Limitations Demonstrated by the Artificial Knee Joint.

Henke P, Ruehrmund L, Bader R, Kebbach M Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(2).

PMID: 38391664 PMC: 10886281. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11020178.


References
1.
Risitano S, Karamian B, Indelli P . Intraoperative load-sensing drives the level of constraint in primary total knee arthroplasty: Surgical technique and review of the literature. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017; 8(3):265-269. PMC: 5605726. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.06.004. View

2.
Willing R, Moslemian A, Yamomo G, Wood T, Howard J, Lanting B . Condylar-Stabilized TKR May Not Fully Compensate for PCL-Deficiency: An In Vitro Cadaver Study. J Orthop Res. 2019; 37(10):2172-2181. DOI: 10.1002/jor.24392. View

3.
Serra Cruz R, Olivetto J, Dean C, Chahla J, LaPrade R . Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament of the Knee: Anatomic Augmentation With Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Autografts. Arthrosc Tech. 2016; 5(2):e347-52. PMC: 4949413. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.01.011. View

4.
Guess T, Razu S, Jahandar H . Evaluation of Knee Ligament Mechanics Using Computational Models. J Knee Surg. 2016; 29(2):126-37. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571954. View

5.
Lin K, Huang C, Liu Y, Chen W, Chang T, Yang C . Influence of post-cam design of posterior stabilized knee prosthesis on tibiofemoral motion during high knee flexion. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2011; 26(8):847-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.04.002. View