» Articles » PMID: 30078414

Measuring the Sensitivity of Total Knee Replacement Kinematics and Laxity to Soft Tissue Imbalances

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2018 Aug 7
PMID 30078414
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ligament balancing during total knee replacement (TKR) is receiving increased attention due to its influence on resulting joint kinematics and laxity. We employed a novel in vitro technique to measure the kinematics and laxity of TKR implants during gait, and measured how these characteristics are influenced by implant shape and soft tissue balancing, simulated using virtual ligaments. Compared with virtual ligaments that were equally balanced in flexion and extension, the largest changes in stance-phase tibiofemoral AP and IE kinematics occurred when the virtual ligaments were simulated to be tighter in extension (tibia offset 1.0 ± 0.1 mm posterior and 3.6 ± 0.1° externally rotated). Virtual ligaments which were tight in flexion caused the largest swing-phase changes in AP kinematics (tibia offset 2.3 ± 0.2 mm), whereas ligaments which were tight in extension caused the largest swing-phase changes in IE kinematics (4.2 ± 0.1° externally rotated). When AP and IE loads were superimposed upon normal gait loads, incremental changes in AP and IE kinematics occurred (similar to laxity testing); and these incremental changes were smallest for joints with virtual ligaments that were tight in extension (in both the stance and swing phases). Two different implant designs (symmetric versus medially congruent) exhibited different kinematics and sensitivities to superimposed loads, but demonstrated similar responses to changes in ligament balancing. Our results demonstrate the potential for pre-clinical testing of implants using joint motion simulators with virtual soft tissues to better understand how ligament balancing affects implant motion.

Citing Articles

Muscle-Driven Total Knee Replacement Stability with Virtual Ligaments.

Galley A, Donnelly E, Borukhov I, Lanting B, Willing R Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40001632 PMC: 11851665. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020112.


Constraint of Different Knee Implant Designs Under Anterior-Posterior Shear Forces and Internal-External Rotation Moments in Human Cadaveric Knees.

Brendle S, Krueger S, Grifka J, Muller P, Mihalko W, Richter B Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39851361 PMC: 11761548. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12010087.


Posterior tibial slope influences joint mechanics and soft tissue loading after total knee arthroplasty.

Guo N, Smith C, Schutz P, Trepczynski A, Moewis P, Damm P Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1352794.

PMID: 38686117 PMC: 11056792. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1352794.


Impact of Structural Compliance of a Six Degree of Freedom Joint Simulator on Virtual Ligament Force Calculation in Total Knee Endoprosthesis Testing.

Kleist E, Henke P, Ruehrmund L, Kebbach M, Bader R, Woernle C Life (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38672801 PMC: 11050787. DOI: 10.3390/life14040531.


Virtual Joint Motion Simulator Accurately Predicts Effects of Femoral Component Malalignment during TKA.

Montgomery L, Willing R, Lanting B Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(5).

PMID: 37237573 PMC: 10215153. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10050503.