» Articles » PMID: 36485130

Molecular Prognostication in Ph-negative MPNs in 2022

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The application of genomic techniques, including cytogenetics and DNA sequencing, to decipher the molecular landscape of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) has radically modified diagnostic approach and management through improved risk stratification. Three driver mutated genes (JAK2, MPL, CALR) are variably harbored by >80% of patients and associated with clinical characteristics, as well as major disease-related complications and different survival outcomes. Therefore, JAK2 V617F mutation is included in the revised International Prognosis Score of Thrombosis for Essential Thrombocythemia score for prediction of thrombosis in patients with essential thrombocythemia and prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis, while a CALR type 1 mutated genotype constitutes a favorable variable for survival in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Novel, integrated clinical and cytogenetic/mutation scores (Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System for Transplantation-Age Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70/v2], genetically inspired prognostic scoring system [GIPSS], Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET- Prognostic Model [MYSEC-PM]) have been devised that guide selection of stem cell transplantation candidates with MF or help predict the risk associated with the transplant procedure (Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System), with greater performance compared with conventional scores based on hematologic and clinical variables only. On the other hand, several clinical needs remain unmet despite the great amount of molecular information available nowadays. These include the prediction of evolution to acute leukemia in a clinically actionable time frame, the identification of patients most likely to derive durable benefits from target agents, in primis JAK inhibitors, and, conversely, the significance of molecular responses that develop in patients receiving interferon or some novel agents. Here, we discuss briefly the significance and the role of genomic analysis for prognostication in patients with MPNs from a clinician's point of view, with the intent to provide how-to-use hints.

Citing Articles

Cytopenic overt primary myelofibrosis at presentation: Analysis of outcomes in the prospective, real-world ERNEST-2 registry.

Guglielmelli P, Ghirardi A, Carobbio A, Masciulli A, Morrone L, Mora B Hemasphere. 2025; 9(2):e70072.

PMID: 39897086 PMC: 11783225. DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70072.


Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Challenging Dogma.

Spivak J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39598101 PMC: 11595126. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226957.


Editorial: Biological and clinical implications of the mutational landscape in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Loscocco G, Mora B, Gangat N Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1454837.

PMID: 39081715 PMC: 11286582. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1454837.


Liver and spleen shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis and severity staging of myeloproliferative diseases and myelofibrosis.

Sansone V, Auteri G, Tovoli F, Mazzoni C, Paglia S, Di Pietro C J Ultrasound. 2024; 27(3):715-722.

PMID: 39060716 PMC: 11333402. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-024-00932-6.


Retinal Vessel Analysis and Microvascular Abnormalities in Patients with Philadelphia-Negative Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Roszkowska A, Leanza R, Aragona E, Gargiulo L, Alibrandi A, Arrigo A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 38673505 PMC: 11051207. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082232.


References
1.
Borowczyk M, Wojtaszewska M, Lewandowski K, Gil L, Lewandowska M, Lehmann-Kopydlowska A . The JAK2 V617F mutational status and allele burden may be related with the risk of venous thromboembolic events in patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. Thromb Res. 2015; 135(2):272-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.11.006. View

2.
Vannucchi A, Lasho T, Guglielmelli P, Biamonte F, Pardanani A, Pereira A . Mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2013; 27(9):1861-9. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2013.119. View

3.
Marcellino B, Hoffman R, Tripodi J, Lu M, Kosiorek H, Mascarenhas J . Advanced forms of MPNs are accompanied by chromosomal abnormalities that lead to dysregulation of TP53. Blood Adv. 2018; 2(24):3581-3589. PMC: 6306879. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024018. View

4.
Guglielmelli P, Lasho T, Rotunno G, Score J, Mannarelli C, Pancrazzi A . The number of prognostically detrimental mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis: an international study of 797 patients. Leukemia. 2014; 28(9):1804-10. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2014.76. View

5.
Guglielmelli P, Loscocco G, Mannarelli C, Rossi E, Mannelli F, Ramundo F . JAK2V617F variant allele frequency >50% identifies patients with polycythemia vera at high risk for venous thrombosis. Blood Cancer J. 2021; 11(12):199. PMC: 8665926. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-021-00581-6. View