» Articles » PMID: 24549259

The Number of Prognostically Detrimental Mutations and Prognosis in Primary Myelofibrosis: an International Study of 797 Patients

Abstract

We recently defined a high-molecular risk category (HMR) in primary myelofibrosis (PMF), based on the presence of at least one of the five 'prognostically detrimental' mutated genes (ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2 and IDH1/2). Herein, we evaluate the additional prognostic value of the 'number' of mutated genes. A total of 797 patients were recruited from Europe (n=537) and the Mayo Clinic (n=260). In the European cohort, 167 (31%) patients were HMR: 127 (23.6%) had one and 40 (7.4%) had two or more mutated genes. The presence of two or more mutations predicted the worst survival: median 2.6 years (hazard ratio (HR) 3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-5.7) vs. 7.0 years (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4-2.6) for one mutation vs 12.3 years for no mutations. The results were validated in the Mayo cohort and prognostic significance in both cohorts was independent of International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS; HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.6-3.6) and dynamic IPSS (DIPSS)-plus (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.1), respectively. Two or more mutations were also associated with shortened leukemia-free survival (HR 6.2, 95% CI 3.5-10.7), also Mayo validated. Calreticulin mutations favorably affected survival, independently of both number of mutations and IPSS/DIPSS-plus. We conclude that the 'number' of prognostically detrimental mutations provides added value in the combined molecular and clinical prognostication of PMF.

Citing Articles

Synergistic effect of concurrent high molecular risk mutations and lower JAK2 mutant variant allele frequencies on prognosis in patients with myelofibrosis-insights from a multicenter study.

Wang Y, Wei C, Lin C, Gurnari C, Awada H, Benajiba L Leukemia. 2024; 39(1):144-154.

PMID: 39367172 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02422-4.


Characterization of myeloproliferative neoplasms based on genetics only and prognostication of transformation to blast phase.

Walter W, Nadarajah N, Hutter S, Muller H, Haferlach C, Kern W Leukemia. 2024; 38(12):2644-2652.

PMID: 39341969 PMC: 11588659. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02425-1.


IDH2 mutation accelerates TPO-induced myelofibrosis with enhanced S100a8/a9 and NFκB signaling in vivo.

Lin C, Yao C, Wang Y, Hsu Y, Yuan C, Chen T EJHaem. 2024; 5(4):738-748.

PMID: 39157630 PMC: 11327712. DOI: 10.1002/jha2.983.


Function of serine/arginine-rich splicing factors in hematopoiesis and hematopoietic malignancies.

Zhang H, Zhu H, Peng H, Sheng Y Cancer Cell Int. 2024; 24(1):257.

PMID: 39034387 PMC: 11265194. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-024-03438-7.


Immunofluorescence microscopy on the blood smear identifies patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Zaninetti C, Vater L, Kaderali L, Crodel C, Schnoder T, Fuhrmann J Leukemia. 2024; 38(9):2051-2058.

PMID: 39020061 PMC: 11347374. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02346-z.


References
1.
Rumi E, Pietra D, Ferretti V, Klampfl T, Harutyunyan A, Milosevic J . JAK2 or CALR mutation status defines subtypes of essential thrombocythemia with substantially different clinical course and outcomes. Blood. 2013; 123(10):1544-51. PMC: 3945864. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-539098. View

2.
Vannucchi A, Lasho T, Guglielmelli P, Biamonte F, Pardanani A, Pereira A . Mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2013; 27(9):1861-9. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2013.119. View

3.
Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, Passamonti F, Reilly J, Morra E . New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2008; 113(13):2895-901. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-170449. View

4.
Guglielmelli P, Biamonte F, Rotunno G, Artusi V, Artuso L, Bernardis I . Impact of mutational status on outcomes in myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib in the COMFORT-II study. Blood. 2014; 123(14):2157-60. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-536557. View

5.
Vannucchi A, Guglielmelli P, Tefferi A . Advances in understanding and management of myeloproliferative neoplasms. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009; 59(3):171-91. DOI: 10.3322/caac.20009. View