» Articles » PMID: 36483250

Effects of General and Corona-specific Stressors on Mental Burden During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Germany

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Dec 9
PMID 36483250
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic turned out to be a serious threat to mental and physical health. However, the relative contribution of corona-specific (DH) and general stressors (DH) on mental burden, and specific protective and risk factors for mental health are still not well understood. In a representative sample ( = 3,055) of the German adult population, mental health, potential risk, and protective factors as well as DH and DH exposure were assessed online during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (June and July 2020). The impact of these factors on mental health was analyzed using descriptive statistics, data visualizations, multiple regressions, and moderation analyses. The most burdensome DH were financial and sleeping problems, respectively, and DH corona-media reports and exclusion from recreational activities/important social events. 31 and 24% of total mental health was explained by DH and DH, respectively. Both predictors combined explained 36%, resulting in an increase in variance due to DH of only 5% (R adjusted). Being female, older and a lower educational level were identified as general risk factors, somatic diseases as a corona-specific risk factor, and self-efficacy and locus of control (LOC) proved to be corona-specific protective factors. Further analyses showed that older age and being diagnosed with a somatic illness attenuated the positive influence of LOC, self-efficacy, and social support on resilience. Although the data showed that after the first easing restrictions, the stressor load was comparable to pre-pandemic data (with DH not making a significant contribution), different risk and protective factors could be identified for general and corona-specific stressors. In line with observations from network analysis from other groups, the positive impact of resilience factors was especially diminished in the most vulnerable groups (elderly and somatically ill). This highlights the need to especially target these vulnerable groups to foster their resilience in upcoming waves of the corona pandemic.

Citing Articles

How personality functioning relates to psychological distress and behavioral attitudes during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Kampe L, Horz-Sagstetter S, Bohn J, Remmers C Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024; 275(1):167-180.

PMID: 38183464 PMC: 11799023. DOI: 10.1007/s00406-023-01722-7.

References
1.
Mancini A, Bonanno G . Predictors and parameters of resilience to loss: toward an individual differences model. J Pers. 2009; 77(6):1805-32. PMC: 4224188. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00601.x. View

2.
Van Bavel J, Baicker K, Boggio P, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M . Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020; 4(5):460-471. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. View

3.
Fisher J, Tran T, Hammarberg K, Nguyen H, Stocker R, Rowe H . Quantifying the mental health burden of the most severe covid-19 restrictions: A natural experiment. J Affect Disord. 2021; 293:406-414. PMC: 8264352. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.060. View

4.
Garcia de Avila M, Hamamoto Filho P, Jacob F, Alcantara L, Berghammer M, Nolbris M . Children's Anxiety and Factors Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study Using the Children's Anxiety Questionnaire and the Numerical Rating Scale. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(16). PMC: 7459447. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165757. View

5.
Kalisch R, Baker D, Basten U, Boks M, Bonanno G, Brummelman E . The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders. Nat Hum Behav. 2019; 1(11):784-790. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0200-8. View