» Articles » PMID: 36480559

Prevalence and Prognostic Role of L Wave and Selected Clinical and Echocardiographic Variables in Dogs with Atrial Fibrillation

Overview
Date 2022 Dec 8
PMID 36480559
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Information regarding the frequency of L waves and their prognostic relevance in dogs with secondary atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited.

Hypothesis/objectives: To determine whether L waves occur and ascertain their prognostic role, as well as the role of other clinical and echocardiographic variables in dogs with AF.

Animals: Fifty-five dogs with AF associated with myxomatous mitral valve disease or dilated cardiomyopathy.

Methods: Retrospective, multicenter observational study. In addition to L waves analysis, other clinical and echocardiographic variables, including type of antiarrhythmic treatment, were evaluated. A survival analysis was performed to test for predictors of cardiac death and all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Results: L waves were evident in 33/55 dogs (60%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 47%-72%) but their presence did not influence outcome. Increased left ventricular end-systolic diameter normalized for body weight (LVSDn) was a significant predictor of both cardiac death (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.41, 95% CI = 1.18-16.54; P = .03) and all-cause mortality (HR = 9.39, 95% CI = 2.49-35.32; P < .001). Heart rate assessed during echocardiography (Echo-HR) represented an additional significant predictor of cardiac death (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00-1.01; P = .04) and all-cause mortality (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00-1.01; P = .04).

Conclusions And Clinical Importance: L waves occurred frequently in dogs with AF, but held no prognostic relevance. Conversely, LVSDn and Echo-HR represented independent predictors of negative outcome in these animals.

Citing Articles

Management of two dogs with post-operative new-onset persistent atrial fibrillation following mitral valve repair.

Kurogochi K, Nishiyama M, Masaki H, Asakawa M, Uechi M Vet Med Sci. 2025; 11(1):e70029.

PMID: 39812505 PMC: 11734185. DOI: 10.1002/vms3.70029.


Evaluation of Galectin-3 in Dogs with Atrial Fibrillation.

Arcuri G, Valente C, Romito G, Bonsembiante F, Mazzoldi C, Contiero B Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272333 PMC: 11394297. DOI: 10.3390/ani14172547.


Longitudinal analysis of echocardiographic and cardiac biomarker variables in dogs with atrial fibrillation: The optimal rate control in dogs with atrial fibrillation II study.

Pedro B, Mavropoulou A, Oyama M, Linney C, Neves J, Dukes-McEwan J J Vet Intern Med. 2024; 38(4):2076-2088.

PMID: 38877661 PMC: 11256134. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.17120.


Risk Factors for Atrial Fibrillation in the Dog: A Systematic Review.

Arcuri G, Valente C, Perini C, Guglielmini C Vet Sci. 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 38275929 PMC: 10818451. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11010047.


Risk factors for atrial fibrillation in dogs with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Guglielmini C, Valente C, Romito G, Mazzoldi C, Baron Toaldo M, Goncalves Sousa M Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1183689.

PMID: 37228845 PMC: 10203468. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1183689.


References
1.
Cornell C, Kittleson M, Della Torre P, Haggstrom J, Lombard C, Pedersen H . Allometric scaling of M-mode cardiac measurements in normal adult dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2004; 18(3):311-21. DOI: 10.1892/0891-6640(2004)18<311:asomcm>2.0.co;2. View

2.
Gelzer A, Kraus M, Rishniw M . Evaluation of in-hospital electrocardiography versus 24-hour Holter for rate control in dogs with atrial fibrillation. J Small Anim Pract. 2015; 56(7):456-62. DOI: 10.1111/jsap.12363. View

3.
Neves J, Pedro B, Christley R, Dukes-McEwan J . Usefulness of pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging at the mitral annulus for prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation in dogs. J Vet Cardiol. 2018; 20(6):425-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvc.2018.10.002. View

4.
Keren G, Meisner J, Sherez J, Yellin E, Laniado S . Interrelationship of mid-diastolic mitral valve motion, pulmonary venous flow, and transmitral flow. Circulation. 1986; 74(1):36-44. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.74.1.36. View

5.
Pastore M, De Carli G, Mandoli G, DAscenzi F, Focardi M, Contorni F . The prognostic role of speckle tracking echocardiography in clinical practice: evidence and reference values from the literature. Heart Fail Rev. 2020; 26(6):1371-1381. DOI: 10.1007/s10741-020-09945-9. View