» Articles » PMID: 36478645

Genetic Aetiology Distribution of 398 Foetuses with Congenital Heart Disease in the Prenatal Setting

Overview
Journal ESC Heart Fail
Date 2022 Dec 8
PMID 36478645
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Copy number variant-sequencing (CNV-seq) and exome sequencing (ES) have been used as powerful tools in understanding the role of genetic variants in congenital heart diseases (CHDs). A few previous large cohort studies have utilized CNV-seq and ES to investigate prenatally diagnosed CHD. Here, we sought to determine the value of CNV-seq and ES for genetic evaluation of foetal CHDs.

Methods And Results: We recruited 398 pregnant women diagnosed with CHDs between 8 January 2017 and 30 November 2020. CNV-seq and ES were performed on foetal and parent samples. CHD cases were classified following the guidelines of the International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code and the Tenth and Eleventh Revisions of the International Classification of Diseases. Data on aneuploids (AUP), pathogenic CNVs (pCNVs), and single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were collected and compared, following appropriate procedures. We identified genetic abnormalities in 129 (32.41%) foetuses. These abnormalities included AUP (10.80%), pCNVs (13.32%), and SNVs (8.04%). ES analysis yielded higher SNVs in cases without AUP or pCNVs. Non-isolated CHDs were associated with higher genetic abnormalities than isolated CHDs, mainly due to AUP differences between the two groups. The prevalence of genetic defects was the highest in foetuses with atrioventricular septal defects (AVSD), left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), and conotruncal defects (CTD). AVSD and anomalies of atrioventricular junctions and valves were associated with AUP abnormalities. CTD, anomalies of extrapericardial arterial trunks, and anomalies of the ventricular outflow tracts were the most common CHD categories diagnosed using CNVs. The most common CHDs associated with single ventricle (SV) abnormalities were heterotaxy (Hex) (14.89%), LVOTO (14.58%), and ventricular septal defect (VSD) (26.67%, 4/15). Although the ES yields were higher than CNV-seq for VSD (44.4%, 4/9), LVOTO (20%, 7/35), Hex (14.89%, 7/47), and CTD (9.1%, 11/121), its diagnostic yield did not increase for SV (6.7%, 1/15), AVSD (3.8%, 1/26), or right ventricular obstruction defects (2.6%, 1/38). The most common mutations were observed in KMT2D, CHD7, and NOTCH1.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort study to investigate the incidence of SNVs using ES in foetal CHD. CNV-seq and ES identified genetic abnormalities in nearly 1/3 of foetal CHD cases. Thus, CNV-seq and ES can provide clinically relevant information for pregnancy management.

Citing Articles

Prenatal finding of isolated ventricular septal defect: genetic association, outcomes and counseling.

Chen X, Zhang Q, Lu M, Feng Q, Qin L, Liao S Front Genet. 2024; 15:1447216.

PMID: 39415979 PMC: 11479991. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1447216.


Efficiency of copy number variation sequencing combined with karyotyping in fetuses with congenital heart disease and the following outcomes.

Wang X, Sha J, Han Y, Pang M, Liu M, Liu M Mol Cytogenet. 2024; 17(1):12.

PMID: 38741090 PMC: 11089693. DOI: 10.1186/s13039-024-00681-5.


Contribution of genetic variants to congenital heart defects in both singleton and twin fetuses: a Chinese cohort study.

Lin S, Shi S, Lu J, He Z, Li D, Huang L Mol Cytogenet. 2024; 17(1):2.

PMID: 38178226 PMC: 10768341. DOI: 10.1186/s13039-023-00664-y.


Analysis of copy number variations and possible candidate genes in spontaneous abortion by copy number variation sequencing.

Bai W, Zhang Q, Lin Z, Ye J, Shen X, Zhou L Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1218793.

PMID: 37916154 PMC: 10616874. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1218793.


Genetic aetiology distribution of 398 foetuses with congenital heart disease in the prenatal setting.

Yi T, Hao X, Sun H, Zhang Y, Han J, Gu X ESC Heart Fail. 2022; 10(2):917-930.

PMID: 36478645 PMC: 10053168. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14209.

References
1.
Allen A, Cossette P, Delanty N, Eichler E, Goldstein D, Han Y . De novo mutations in epileptic encephalopathies. Nature. 2013; 501(7466):217-21. PMC: 3773011. DOI: 10.1038/nature12439. View

2.
McDonald-McGinn D, Sullivan K, Marino B, Philip N, Swillen A, Vorstman J . 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016; 1:15071. PMC: 4900471. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.71. View

3.
Qiao F, Wang Y, Zhang C, Zhou R, Wu Y, Wang C . Comprehensive evaluation of genetic variants using chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing in fetuses with congenital heart defect. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 58(3):377-387. DOI: 10.1002/uog.23532. View

4.
Houyel L, Khoshnood B, Anderson R, Lelong N, Thieulin A, Goffinet F . Population-based evaluation of a suggested anatomic and clinical classification of congenital heart defects based on the International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011; 6:64. PMC: 3198675. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-64. View

5.
Wang Y, Li Y, Chen Y, Zhou R, Sang Z, Meng L . Systematic analysis of copy-number variations associated with early pregnancy loss. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 55(1):96-104. DOI: 10.1002/uog.20412. View