» Articles » PMID: 36451138

CT Scans and Cancer Risks: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Nov 30
PMID 36451138
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is still uncertainty on whether ionizing radiation from CT scans can increase the risks of cancer. This study aimed to identify the association of cumulative ionizing radiation from CT scans with pertaining cancer risks in adults.

Methods: Five databases were searched from their inception to November 15, 2020. Observational studies reporting cancer risks from CT scans in adults were included. The main outcome included quantified cancer risks as cancer case numbers in exposed/unexposed adult participants with unified converted measures to odds ratio (OR) for relative risk, hazard ratio. Global background radiation (2.4 mSv per year) was used as control for lifetime attribution risk (LAR), with the same period from incubation after exposure until survival to 100 years.

Results: 25 studies were included with a sum of 111,649,943 participants (mean age: 45.37 years, 83.4% women), comprising 2,049,943 actual participants from 6 studies with an average follow-up period as 30.1 years (range, 5 to 80 years); 109,600,000 participants from 19 studies using LAR. The cancer risks for adults following CT scans were inordinately increased (LAR adults, OR, 10.00 [95% CI, 5.87 to 17.05]; actual adults, OR, 1.17 [95%CI, 0.89 to 1.55]; combined, OR, 5.89 [95%CI, 3.46 to 10.35]). Moreover, cancer risks elevated with increase of radiation dose (OR, 33.31 [95% CI, 21.33 to 52.02]), and multiple CT scan sites (OR, 14.08 [95% CI, 6.60 to 30.05]). The risk of solid malignancy was higher than leukemia. Notably, there were no significant differences for age, gender, country, continent, study quality and studying time phrases.

Conclusions: Based on 111.6 million adult participants from 3 continents (Asia, Europe and America), this meta-analysis identifies an inordinately increase in cancer risks from CT scans for adults. Moreover, the cancer risks were positively correlated with radiation dose and CT sites. The meta-analysis highlights the awareness of potential cancer risks of CT scans as well as more reasonable methodology to quantify cancer risks in terms of life expectancy as 100 years for LAR.

Prospero Trial Registration Number: CRD42019133487.

Citing Articles

Hybrid iterative reconstruction in ultra-low-dose CT for accurate pulmonary nodule assessment: A Phantom study.

Chen L, Kao H, Wu P, Sheu M, Tu H, Huang L Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104(8):e41612.

PMID: 39993104 PMC: 11856928. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041612.


The Impact of Diagnostic Imaging on Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Feedback from a Narrative Review.

Lavalle S, Caranti A, Iannella G, Pace A, Lentini M, Maniaci A Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941168 PMC: 11816599. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030238.


Ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography with model-based iterative reconstruction in the analysis of solid pulmonary nodules: A prospective study.

ORegan P, Harold-Barry A, OMahony A, Crowley C, Joyce S, Moore N World J Radiol. 2024; 16(11):668-677.

PMID: 39635307 PMC: 11612801. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i11.668.


Impact of deep learning reconstruction on radiation dose reduction and cancer risk in CT examinations: a real-world clinical analysis.

Kobayashi N, Nakaura T, Yoshida N, Nagayama Y, Kidoh M, Uetani H Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39613960 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11212-6.


Single breath-hold volumetric lung imaging at 0.55T using stack-of-spiral (SoS) out-in balanced SSFP.

Tian Y, Lee N, Zhao Z, Wilcox A, Nieva J, Nayak K Magn Reson Med. 2024; 93(5):1999-2007.

PMID: 39607896 PMC: 11893024. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30386.


References
1.
Kim K, Einstein A, Berrington de Gonzalez A . Coronary artery calcification screening: estimated radiation dose and cancer risk. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(13):1188-94. PMC: 2765044. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.162. View

2.
de Basea M, Morina D, Figuerola J, Barber I, Muchart J, Lee C . Subtle excess in lifetime cancer risk related to CT scanning in Spanish young people. Environ Int. 2018; 120:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.020. View

3.
Mettler Jr F, Huda W, Yoshizumi T, Mahesh M . Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008; 248(1):254-63. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2481071451. View

4.
Sodickson A, Baeyens P, Andriole K, Prevedello L, Nawfel R, Hanson R . Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009; 251(1):175-84. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2511081296. View

5.
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C . Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997; 315(7109):629-34. PMC: 2127453. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629. View