» Articles » PMID: 19251940

Whole-body PET/CT Scanning: Estimation of Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2009 Mar 3
PMID 19251940
Citations 180
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the radiation dose from whole-body fluorine 18 ((18)F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomographic (PET)/computed tomographic (CT) studies and to evaluate the induced cancer risk to U.S. and Hong Kong populations.

Materials And Methods: Fluorine 18-FDG PET/CT studies obtained by using a 64-detector CT unit and one of three CT protocols were evaluated. CT protocol A consisted of 120 kV; rotation time, 0.5 second; pitch, 0.984; 100-300 mA; and noise level, 20. CT protocol B was the same as A, except for a fixed tube current of 250 mA. CT protocol C consisted of 140 kV; rotation time, 0.5 second; pitch, 0.984; 150-350 mA; and noise level, 3.5. CT doses were measured in a humanoid phantom equipped with thermoluminescent dosimeters. Doses from (18)F-FDG PET scanning were estimated by multiplying the (18)F-FDG radioactivity (370 MBq) with dose coefficients. Effective doses were calculated according to International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103. Lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence was estimated according to the National Academies' Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report.

Results: Effective doses with protocols A, B, and C, respectively, were 13.45, 24.79, and 31.91 mSv for female patients and 13.65, 24.80, and 32.18 mSv for male patients. The LAR of cancer incidence associated with the dose was higher in the Hong Kong population than in the U.S. population. For 20-year-old U.S. women, LARs of cancer incidence were between 0.231% and 0.514%, and for 20-year-old U.S. men, LARs of cancer incidence were between 0.163% and 0.323%; LARs were 5.5%-20.9% higher for the Hong Kong population. The induced cancer risks decreased when age at exposure increased.

Conclusion: Whole-body PET/CT scanning is accompanied by substantial radiation dose and cancer risk. Thus, examinations should be clinically justified, and measures should be taken to reduce the dose.

Citing Articles

Use of diagnostic vs low-dose computed tomography in positron emission tomography-CT examinations.

Malekhedayat M, Stewart C, Chu P, Wang Y, Kasraie N, Franc B Eur Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40055228 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11391-w.


Perfusion estimation from dynamic non-contrast computed tomography using self-supervised learning and a physics-inspired U-net transformer architecture.

Liu Y, Cisneros J, Nair G, Stevens C, Castillo R, Vinogradskiy Y Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2025; .

PMID: 39832070 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-025-03323-2.


A Systematic Review of the Applications of Deep Learning for the Interpretation of Positron Emission Tomography Images of Patients with Lymphoma.

Kanavos T, Birbas E, Zanos T Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796698 PMC: 11719749. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010069.


Automated Measurement of Effective Radiation Dose by F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.

Eom Y, Park Y, Lee S, Lee S, An Y, Park B Tomography. 2024; 10(12):2144-2157.

PMID: 39728913 PMC: 11679132. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10120151.


Deep learning-based low count whole-body positron emission tomography denoising incorporating computed tomography priors.

Peng Z, Zhang F, Jiang H, Liu G, Sun J, Du Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(12):8140-8154.

PMID: 39698633 PMC: 11652058. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-489.