» Articles » PMID: 36449340

End Users' and Other Stakeholders' Needs and Requirements in the Development of a Personalized Integrated Care Platform (PROCare4Life) for Older People With Dementia or Parkinson Disease: Mixed Methods Study

Overview
Journal JMIR Form Res
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2022 Nov 30
PMID 36449340
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: With what has been known as the "triple-win effect", introducing information and communication technologies (ICTs) in the health care of neurodegenerative diseases is beneficial in delaying the need for institutional care, reducing the associated health care costs, reducing the caregiving burden, and improving individuals' quality of life. Nevertheless, the mismatch between the users' expectations and their actual needs remains one of the main challenges that can reduce the usability of technology solutions. Therefore, the European project Personalized Integrated Care Promoting Quality of Life for Older People (PROCare4Life), which aimed to develop an ICT-based platform for all parties involved in the health care of neurodegenerative diseases, adopted a user-centered design approach, where all users are involved from the inception and throughout the platform development and implementation to integrate their needs and requirements in the proposed platform.

Objective: This paper presents the results of a study on the needs and requirements of the potential end users (older people with neurodegenerative diseases, caregivers, and health care professionals) and other key stakeholders in the development of the PROCare4Life platform.

Methods: A mixed qualitative and quantitative study design was used, including 2 web-based surveys, 40 interviews, and 4 workshops. The study was conducted between April and September 2020 in 5 European countries: Germany, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and Spain. Both data types were analyzed separately and then merged and interpreted, with greater priority placed on qualitative research.

Results: A total of 217 participants were recruited; 157 (72.4%) of them completed the web-based surveys (n=85, 54.1% patients and n=72, 45.9% caregivers), and 60 (27.6%) individuals participated in the qualitative research (20/60, 33% health care professionals; 5/60, 8% patients; 5/60, 8% caregivers; and 30/60, 50% key stakeholders). We identified 3 main themes (T): (T1) experiences associated with illness, (T2) thoughts about the platform technology, and (T3) desired properties. Alerts for adverse events, communication tools, reminders, and monitoring are constantly needed functionalities, whereas ease of use, personalization, and user-friendliness are foreseen as necessary features.

Conclusions: This paper identified the key personal, social, and health factors that influence the daily lives of the potential end users and reflected on their needs and expectations regarding the design of the proposed PROCare4Life platform. The collected data were useful for the development of the PROCare4Life platform. Although the combination and collection of features for diverse user groups are typical for integrated care platforms, it results in exponential complexity for designers, developers, and users. Contradicting opinions and several concerns in this study demonstrate that an ICT-integrated care platform should not promise too much for too many. Instead, selection, focus, and, sometimes, restriction to essentials are necessary. Users and other stakeholders should be involved in these decisions.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/22463.

Citing Articles

How to design equitable digital health tools: A narrative review of design tactics, case studies, and opportunities.

Bucher A, Chaudhry B, Davis J, Lawrence K, Panza E, Baqer M PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(8):e0000591.

PMID: 39172776 PMC: 11340894. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000591.


Improving the Acceptability and Implementation of Information and Communication Technology-Based Health Care Platforms for Older People With Dementia or Parkinson Disease: Qualitative Study Results of Key Stakeholders.

Ahmed M, Marin M, Gangas P, Bentlage E, Louro C, Brach M JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e58501.

PMID: 38935424 PMC: 11240067. DOI: 10.2196/58501.


Assessment of cognitive games to improve the quality of life of Parkinson's and Alzheimer's patients.

Llorente A, Del Rio A, Can Semerci Y, Alfonso Kurano J, Jimenez D, Menendez J Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241254733.

PMID: 38784051 PMC: 11113061. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241254733.


PROCare4Life lessons learned.

Gangas P, Judica E, Marin M, Bouca-Machado R, Ferreira J, Louro C Open Res Eur. 2024; 3:147.

PMID: 38629060 PMC: 11019287. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.16304.2.


Information and Communication Technology for Managing Social Isolation and Loneliness Among People Living With Parkinson Disease: Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators.

Thangavel G, Memedi M, Hedstrom K J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e48175.

PMID: 38231548 PMC: 10831595. DOI: 10.2196/48175.


References
1.
Boman I, Persson A, Bartfai A . First steps in designing an all-in-one ICT-based device for persons with cognitive impairment: evaluation of the first mock-up. BMC Geriatr. 2016; 16:61. PMC: 4782386. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-016-0238-x. View

2.
van Boekel L, Wouters E, Grimberg B, van der Meer N, Luijkx K . Perspectives of Stakeholders on Technology Use in the Care of Community-Living Older Adults with Dementia: A Systematic Literature Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2019; 7(2). PMC: 6628181. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare7020073. View

3.
Fares N, Sherratt R, Elhajj I . Directing and Orienting ICT Healthcare Solutions to Address the Needs of the Aging Population. Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(2). PMC: 7912863. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9020147. View

4.
Evald L . Prospective memory rehabilitation using smartphones in patients with TBI: What do participants report?. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014; 25(2):283-97. DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2014.970557. View

5.
Scalvini S, Giordano A . Heart failure. Optimal postdischarge management of chronic HF. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012; 10(1):9-10. DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.161. View